2008
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimized method for measurement of gamma-H2AX in blood mononuclear and cultured cells

Abstract: Phosphorylation of histone protein H2AX on serine 139 (gamma-H2AX) occurs at sites flanking DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) and can provide a measure of the number of DSBs within a cell. We describe a flow cytometry-based method optimized to measure gamma-H2AX in nonfixed mononuclear blood cells as well as in cultured cells, which is more sensitive and involves less steps compared with protocols involving fixed cells. This method can be used to monitor induction of gamma-H2AX in mononuclear cells from cancer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…␥H2AX nuclear foci were analyzed by immunofluorescence staining using a rabbit polyclonal antiphospho H2AX (Ser-139) (Millipore) and imaged on a Leica DMRA2 fluorescence microscope using ϫ400 oil immersion objective. Freshly isolated bone marrow cells stained for HSPC were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and stained overnight at 4°C with 1:100 mouse monoclonal anti-H2AX pS139 FITC conjugate (Millipore) (or anti-H2AX pS139 APC conjugate, Biolegend) in BLOCK9 solution as described previously (54). The samples were next diluted into PBS, 2% FBS and analyzed by FACS.…”
Section: ␥H2ax Analysis By Immunofluorescence Staining and Flow Cytommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…␥H2AX nuclear foci were analyzed by immunofluorescence staining using a rabbit polyclonal antiphospho H2AX (Ser-139) (Millipore) and imaged on a Leica DMRA2 fluorescence microscope using ϫ400 oil immersion objective. Freshly isolated bone marrow cells stained for HSPC were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and stained overnight at 4°C with 1:100 mouse monoclonal anti-H2AX pS139 FITC conjugate (Millipore) (or anti-H2AX pS139 APC conjugate, Biolegend) in BLOCK9 solution as described previously (54). The samples were next diluted into PBS, 2% FBS and analyzed by FACS.…”
Section: ␥H2ax Analysis By Immunofluorescence Staining and Flow Cytommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cells were then incubated in the same medium under standard conditions and analysed by flow cytometry 30 min, 1 and 2 days after IR exposure. For analysis, cells were trypsinised, washed twice in PBS, fixed and stained for gH2AX, according to a protocol described elsewhere (Muslimovic et al, 2008). The cells were then counterstained with propidium iodide (Sigma P-4170, 10 mg ml À1 ) in the presence of ribonuclease A (Sigma R-5250, 25 mg ml À1 ) as described elsewhere (Djuzenova et al, 1994 …”
Section: Comet Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of our new method compared with the alternative, currently available approaches based on flow cytometry, physical methods such as electrophoresis, and expensive complex scanning devices 9,18,19,30,35 include: (1) high sensitivity; (2) quantitative data output; (3) low investments for setting up the method (based on standard fluorescence microscope equipped with digital camera and common PC with software available in most laboratories); (4) automation of the routine that allows analysis of thousands of cells per day; and (5) relatively simple operation and high degree of transportability among laboratories, thanks also to our detailed protocols (see the Suppl. information) with both written guides and illustrative movies to facilitate the widespread use of the technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Techniques to assess the DDR markers are evolving, and particularly for nonadherent cells such as lymphocytes, recently optimized protocols based on flow cytometry are convenient, albeit not particularly sensitive means for measurements of g-H2AX. 35 On the other hand, analysis of DNA damage at very low doses, and assessment of the vast majority of cell types that are naturally adherent (for which detachment from substratum is very stressful) require alternative methods which are however presently limited to very costly and sophisticated scanning instruments that require large investments and specially trained personnel. To overcome these limitations, we have developed and report here a versatile, highly sensitive method to quantify various parameters of the DDR in large numbers of adherent individual cells with statistical robustness, at very low cost affordable to most, if not all laboratories, with high degree of automation, and easily usable by the many researchers who are familiar with common fluorescence microscopes and personal computers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%