2012
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimized two-finger archive for ZFN-mediated gene targeting

Abstract: The widespread use of zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) for genome engineering is hampered by the fact that only a subset of sequences can be efficiently recognized using published finger archives. We describe a set of validated two-finger modules that complement existing finger archives and expand the range of ZFN-accessible sequences by three-fold. Using this archive, we successfully introduce lesions at 9 of 11 target sites in the zebrafish genome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
119
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
119
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We tested the activity of each TALEN at its target site upon injecting its mRNAs into zebrafish embryos and verified that the lesion rates for each nuclease were in excess of 20% in normal embryos 24 h post-fertilization (hpf ) (Supplemental Fig. 1; Meng et al 2008;Gupta et al 2012). We then examined whether coinjecting mRNAs encoding the two most proximal TALENs would delete the intervening genomic fragment, which spanned ;500 bp (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We tested the activity of each TALEN at its target site upon injecting its mRNAs into zebrafish embryos and verified that the lesion rates for each nuclease were in excess of 20% in normal embryos 24 h post-fertilization (hpf ) (Supplemental Fig. 1; Meng et al 2008;Gupta et al 2012). We then examined whether coinjecting mRNAs encoding the two most proximal TALENs would delete the intervening genomic fragment, which spanned ;500 bp (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15). The 59 ZFA was assembled from our archive of single finger modules , whereas the 39 ZFA was created using a combination of single finger modules ) and selection of a two-finger module for the AACAGA subsite (Gupta et al 2012). These ZFAs were coupled to the DD/RR versions of FokI endonuclease (Miller et al 2007;Szczepek et al 2007) in a pCS2 backbone (Meng et al 2008).…”
Section: Slc24a5 Locus Zinc Finger Nuclease (Zfn) Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each zinc finger cluster was displayed as a C-terminal fusion to the omega subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase without an accessory DNA-binding domain (Noyes et al 2008b). Complementary binding sites for each ZFP were identified through a single round of selection from a 28-bp randomized library with the recovered sequences characterized by both Sanger and Illumina sequencing (Zhu et al 2011a;Gupta et al 2012). Recognition motifs were identified as overrepresented sequence motifs within the recovered sequences (Zhu et al 2011a;Christensen et al 2012).…”
Section: Determining the Dna-binding Specificities Of Drosophila Zfpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition properties of individual zinc fingers can be influenced by their position in an array and the recognition determinants of their immediate neighbors (Desjarlais and Berg 1993;Wolfe et al 1999;Dreier et al 2001;Sander et al 2009;Zhu et al 2011a), but in some cases, in particular for subsets of specificity determinants with well-defined recognition properties, individual fingers can be assembled in novel combinations to create new recognition modalities (Desjarlais and Berg 1993;Segal et al 1999;Dreier et al 2000Dreier et al , 2001Dreier et al , 2005Liu et al 2002;Bae et al 2003;Kim et al 2009;Zhu et al 2011a). Although some principles that govern the recognition properties of zinc fingers have been developed through the analysis of natural Pabo 1991, 1993;Fairall et al 1993;Laity et al 2000;Bae et al 2003) and artificial (Rebar and Pabo 1994;Segal et al 1999;Dreier et al 2000Dreier et al , 2001Dreier et al , 2005Liu et al 2002;Bae et al 2003;Maeder et al 2008;Kim et al 2009;Sander et al 2011;Zhu et al 2011a;Gupta et al 2012) ZFPs, the ability to accurately predict the DNA-binding specificity of naturally occurring zinc finger assemblies remains suboptimal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this "modular assembly" approach to zinc-finger construction, selection-based methods for constructing zinc-finger proteins have also been reported (Greisman and Pabo 1997;Isalan et al 2001;Hurt et al 2003;Magnenat et al 2004), including those that consider context-dependent interactions between adjacent zinc-finger domains, such as oligomerized pool engineering (OPEN) (Maeder et al 2008). In addition, specialized sets of validated two-finger, zinc-finger modules have been used to assemble zincfinger arrays (Kim et al 2009;Bhakta et al 2013), including those that take context-dependent effects into account (Sander et al 2011b;Gupta et al 2012).…”
Section: Zinc-finger Nucleasesmentioning
confidence: 99%