2014
DOI: 10.17161/np.v0i7.4726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An orchid bee of the genus <i>Eulaema</i> in Early Miocene Mexican amber (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

Abstract: Abstract. The first fossil orchid bee from Early Miocene Mexican amber is described and figured. Eulaema (Apeulaema) zigrasi Engel, new species, represents the first non-meliponine bee fossil documented from Mexican amber as well as the first fossil of its genus. The new species is distinguished from its congeners and comments are briefly made regarding the geological history of Euglossini.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given that the majority of wasps known from Cretaceous amber are often of smaller proportions (i.e., 12 mm or less) (e.g., Liu et al 2007; Engel and Grimaldi 2009; McKellar and Engel 2012; Engel et al 2013, 2017), and this is also true for coeval ants (e.g., Engel and Grimaldi 2005; McKellar et al 2013b, 2013c; Barden and Grimaldi 2013, 2014, 2016; Perrichot et al 2016; Barden et al 2017), one might conclude that the taphonomic bias is true. This is particularly evident when one considers that larger arthropod inclusions are certainly well known, with numerous such examples in these same resins (e.g., Grimaldi et al 2002; Engel and Grimaldi 2008), and certainly this is the case in the diverse Cenozoic ambers (e.g., Engel 1995, 2014; Engel and Grimaldi 2007). Thus, the result of such a taphonomic bias would be that there are any number of ‘ghost’ lineages and for which there assuredly should have been representatives in the Cenomanian (e.g., larger ichneumonoids, varied sizeable aculeates [such as scoliids], siricoid wood wasps, &c.).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, given that the majority of wasps known from Cretaceous amber are often of smaller proportions (i.e., 12 mm or less) (e.g., Liu et al 2007; Engel and Grimaldi 2009; McKellar and Engel 2012; Engel et al 2013, 2017), and this is also true for coeval ants (e.g., Engel and Grimaldi 2005; McKellar et al 2013b, 2013c; Barden and Grimaldi 2013, 2014, 2016; Perrichot et al 2016; Barden et al 2017), one might conclude that the taphonomic bias is true. This is particularly evident when one considers that larger arthropod inclusions are certainly well known, with numerous such examples in these same resins (e.g., Grimaldi et al 2002; Engel and Grimaldi 2008), and certainly this is the case in the diverse Cenozoic ambers (e.g., Engel 1995, 2014; Engel and Grimaldi 2007). Thus, the result of such a taphonomic bias would be that there are any number of ‘ghost’ lineages and for which there assuredly should have been representatives in the Cenomanian (e.g., larger ichneumonoids, varied sizeable aculeates [such as scoliids], siricoid wood wasps, &c.).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A spectacular find was a taxonomically identifiable orchid pollinium attached to a worker of the fossil stingless bee Proplebeia dominicana (Wille et Chandler) in early Miocene (19–15 Ma) amber from the Dominican Republic (Ramírez et al 2007). Prior to this, orchid fossils had not been found from the Dominican Republic, although their presence was predicted by the occurrence of orchid bees (Euglossini) in the same Miocene deposits (Engel 1999) and the same is true for Mexican amber (Engel 2014). Many fossil bees preserved in amber, not only corbiculate bees, have pollen preserved in their scopae or corbiculae (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The success of this work will be measured in the number of forthcoming discoveries stimulated by questions left open here. Euglossines hold a special place among corbiculate bees as they are the only group that is not eusocial and are putatively the earliest-diverging branch (e.g., Schultz et al, 1999Schultz et al, , 2001Engel, 2001b;Noll, 2002;Cardinal & Packer, 2007) within a clade that extends at least to the latest Cretaceous (e.g., Engel, 2000Engel, , 2001aEngel, , 2004Ohl & Engel, 2007), albeit available fossils of orchid bees are much younger (e.g., Engel, 1999Engel, , 2014Hinojosa-Díaz & Engel, 2007b;Michez et al, 2012;Dehon et al, in press). These realities coupled with their unique morphology, behavior, and intimate relationship with orchids makes them of paramount interest, particularly the diverse genus Euglossa which encapsulates 55% of the known species.…”
Section: Mandibularis Species Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%