2019
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8353-0.ch003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Organic Model for edTPA Exploration and Implementation

Abstract: Teacher educators share their experiences in response to the adoption of a high-stakes policy in Georgia regarding the use of edTPA®. Their efforts followed an organic model characterized by the inclusion of three important concepts: (1) distributed leadership, (2) ongoing communication, and (3) a commitment to the evolution of responsibilities and support structures. Stories highlight the importance of collegiality, shared decision making, and clear and open communication within the institution to ensure the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this study was to examine how a TPP 1 design, in alignment with several professional organizations’ recommendations and standards publications, 2 influences TCs’ knowledge, skills, and teaching ability readiness as measured by internal measures over sequenced method courses and field experiences with respect to the external high-stakes, standardized edTPA, particularly the secondary mathematics edTPA (Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity [SCALE], 2020). For context, the structural design of the portfolio incorporates pedagogical constructs (i.e., integrating concepts of planning, instruction, and assessment) and subject-specific pedagogy that aligns with content and pedagogical standards from professional organizations, such as the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM; Moldavan, 2018; Pecheone et al, 2016; Tanguay, 2018). TCs must compile artifacts (e.g., lesson plans, student work samples, video segments) that reveal their abilities to plan, instruct, and assess 3–5 consecutive days of mathematics instruction (SCALE, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study was to examine how a TPP 1 design, in alignment with several professional organizations’ recommendations and standards publications, 2 influences TCs’ knowledge, skills, and teaching ability readiness as measured by internal measures over sequenced method courses and field experiences with respect to the external high-stakes, standardized edTPA, particularly the secondary mathematics edTPA (Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity [SCALE], 2020). For context, the structural design of the portfolio incorporates pedagogical constructs (i.e., integrating concepts of planning, instruction, and assessment) and subject-specific pedagogy that aligns with content and pedagogical standards from professional organizations, such as the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM; Moldavan, 2018; Pecheone et al, 2016; Tanguay, 2018). TCs must compile artifacts (e.g., lesson plans, student work samples, video segments) that reveal their abilities to plan, instruct, and assess 3–5 consecutive days of mathematics instruction (SCALE, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%