“…However, when a physical mixture of Bu 3 SnCl and Na 2 MoO 4 ·2H 2 O was used as a catalyst, the DMC yield and TON were very low, suggesting that the integration of [MoO 4 ] 2– and [Bu 3 Sn] + groups could improve the catalytic activity remarkably and a good synergistic effect was likely to appear between the two groups. , In terms of the DMC yield, the performance of the catalysts followed the order ( n Bu 3 Sn) 2 MoO 4 > ( n Pr 3 Sn) 2 MoO 4 > (Et 3 Sn) 2 MoO 4 > (Me 3 Sn) 2 MoO 4 > (Cy 3 Sn) 2 MoO 4 > (Ph 3 Sn) 2 MoO 4 ·2H 2 O (Table , entries 6–11), indicating that the catalytic activity increased with the increased size of the R coordination group. The active result was also consistent with the sequence of Lewis acidic-basic sites, and ( n Bu 3 Sn) 2 MoO 4 with the largest acidic-basic amount displayed the highest activity, indicating that more acidic-basic sites were conducive to improving the catalytic performance, as several studies have revealed that the acidic-basic sites played a vital role in the catalytic activity. , However, for (Cy 3 Sn) 2 MoO 4 and [(Ph 3 Sn) 2 MoO 4 ]·2H 2 O catalysts (Table , entries 10 and 11), the decrease in activity mainly resulted from the serious steric hindrance of the ring group, which reduced the interactions of the active center of the catalyst with the reactants. , These results suggest that the catalytic performance was strongly affected by the nature of the Sn-bound R coordination group.…”