2019
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmz077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Orthogonal Approach for Determination of Acetamide Content in Pharmaceutical Drug Substance and Base-Contaminated Acetonitrile by GC and GC-MS External Method

Abstract: Acetamide is a potential genotoxic impurity; it should control in drug substance based on daily dosage level. It forms from base-contaminated acetonitrile and by-product of some drug substances. The available methods for acetamide in drug substance and water samples were determined by GC-MS using internal standard with critical procedures. These developed and validated methods can assist in evaluating the reaction between acetonitrile and different bases and also determine trace level acetamide in drug substan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compounds were identified by comparing their retention times and mass spectra with those available in the NIST17 library (National Institute of Science and Technology software, USA). The external standard approach was employed to quantify the relative content of each identified volatile within the collected samples, following the previous protocol ( Rajana et al., 2019 ). Briefly, the standard solutions (1, 10, 50, 100, and 1000 ng/μl) of each compound were prepared in n-hexane ( Supplementary Table S1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compounds were identified by comparing their retention times and mass spectra with those available in the NIST17 library (National Institute of Science and Technology software, USA). The external standard approach was employed to quantify the relative content of each identified volatile within the collected samples, following the previous protocol ( Rajana et al., 2019 ). Briefly, the standard solutions (1, 10, 50, 100, and 1000 ng/μl) of each compound were prepared in n-hexane ( Supplementary Table S1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A PDE value of 7.1 mg (Table ) was determined for acetamide by Bercu et al on the basis of ICH M7­(R1) criteria for a nonmutagenic carcinogen. Given the magnitude of the PDE, 4733 times higher than the default lifetime TTC value of 1.5 μg/day, there is no clear rationale for developing a highly sensitive assay of the type described by Rajana et al…”
Section: Commentary On Publications Involving “Genotoxic Impurities”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A PDE value of 7.1 mg (Table 6) was determined for acetamide by Bercu et al 8 on the basis of ICH M7(R1) criteria for a nonmutagenic carcinogen. Given the magnitude of the PDE, 4733 times higher than the default lifetime TTC value of 1.5 μg/day, there is no clear rationale for developing a highly sensitive assay of the type described by Rajana et al 92 In a 2017 publication on the analysis of potentially genotoxic impurities in pantoprazole sodium drug substance, Subbaiah et al 93 listed the substance N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)acetamide as GTI-A. In fact, GTI-A is paracetamol (4′-hydroxyacetanilide), which is the most commonly used analgesic and antipyretic worldwide.…”
Section: N-oxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per author cognizance, no analytical method was available in the literature for determination of 1-bromo-3 methyl -2-butene/3,3-dimethylallyl bromide at a low level (<10 ppm) in presence of tazarotene drug substance and drug product. Based on earlier experience on quantification of genotoxic impurities in different drug substances, the quantitative method was developed for the determination of 3,3-dimethylallyl bromide genotoxic impurity in tazarotene drug substance by GC-MS [14][15][16]. Many other analytical methods were available to determine the genotoxic impurities by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%