2002
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species

Abstract: Numbers of non-indigenous species-species introduced from elsewhere-are increasing rapidly worldwide, causing both environmental and economic damage. Rigorous quantitative risk-analysis frameworks, however, for invasive species are lacking. We need to evaluate the risks posed by invasive species and quantify the relative merits of different management strategies (e.g. allocation of resources between prevention and control). We present a quantitative bioeconomic modelling framework to analyse risks from nonindi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
592
0
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 802 publications
(625 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
592
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Preventing the introduction of alien taxa is often more cost-effective than managing these taxa after introduction (Leung et al 2002;Puth and Post 2005;Wittenberg and Cock 2005;Simberloff 2006;Simberloff et al 2013). Most efforts to prevent the introduction of alien taxa into a new region focus on species-or pathway-centred approaches (Hulme 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preventing the introduction of alien taxa is often more cost-effective than managing these taxa after introduction (Leung et al 2002;Puth and Post 2005;Wittenberg and Cock 2005;Simberloff 2006;Simberloff et al 2013). Most efforts to prevent the introduction of alien taxa into a new region focus on species-or pathway-centred approaches (Hulme 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal strategy for prevention necessarily depends on the long-term costs to society of an invasion if it were to occur (Olson 2006;Leung et al 2002). Long-term damages from establishment depend on the likelihood of establishment, localized damage impacts, species' temporal characteristics such as lags and rates of spread, and effectiveness and costs of controls postestablishment, among other factors (Epanchin-Niell and Liebhold 2015; Leung et al 2002). Studies on prevention have variously accounted for how invader damage and growth characteristics, introduction probabilities, and the costs and effectiveness of postestablishment control options affect optimal investments in prevention.…”
Section: Invasion Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management efforts to reduce the risk of new introductions provide realistic opportunities to mitigate the ecological and economic uncertainty imposed by invasive ascidians, and they are more effective and less costly than eradication or curtailment of spread of established populations (Leung et al 2002;Lodge et al 2006;Hulme et al 2008;Reaser et al 2008). Besides prevention of new introductions, screening of areas of concerns regularly will be necessary to detect individuals that successfully evade prevention measures (Sephton et al 2011).…”
Section: Management Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%