1996
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-7-199610010-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Outbreak of Type A Botulism Associated with a Commercial Cheese Sauce

Abstract: A commercial, canned cheese caused a botulism outbreak. This product readily becomes toxic when contaminated by C botulinum spores and left at room temperature. Mild botulism caused by unusual vehicles may be misdiagnosed. Botulism should be included in the differential diagnosis of persons with signs or symptoms of acute cranial nerve dysfunction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted during previous foodborne botulism outbreaks, not all persons who eat food contaminated with botulinum toxin become ill [5,13]. The relatively low attack rate of 63% among those who ate the chili dish served at the church supper may be explained by uneven distribution of toxin in the chili, a dose-response relationship, or unrecognized host factors that confer resistance to ingested botulinum toxin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As noted during previous foodborne botulism outbreaks, not all persons who eat food contaminated with botulinum toxin become ill [5,13]. The relatively low attack rate of 63% among those who ate the chili dish served at the church supper may be explained by uneven distribution of toxin in the chili, a dose-response relationship, or unrecognized host factors that confer resistance to ingested botulinum toxin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…5), low oxygen, and high water content. 29 Two of the outbreaks (nos. 1 and 7) were attributed by the farm owners to abnormal weather patterns that caused forage to become unusually wet for prolonged periods of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Stool specimens collected 6 days after toxin consumption from these four patients with toxemia were negative for BoNT and did not contain C. botulinum, suggesting that there was no in vivo toxin production due to an intestinal colonization. Issues that need to be considered are that only 36% of stool samples are positive for BoNT after 3 days, 27 and C. botulinum is present in stool samples of >70% patients within 2 days and 40% after 10 days. 25 In addition, some patients in the first family presented gastrointestinal symptoms initially, including diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain, and this phenomenon may partly explain why only four out of seven patients in the first family had stool samples positive for BoNT type A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%