2013
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An outcome evaluation of a New Zealand farm safety intervention: A historical cohort study

Abstract: It is difficult to see how FarmSafe™ Awareness could be causing an increased rate of work-related injury. We detected no reporting bias, and selection bias is likely to act in the opposite direction to the observed results. We conclude that there is no evidence that FarmSafe™ Awareness prevents farm injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, an evaluation of FarmSafe (the New Zealand Farm Safety Intervention program) concluded there was no evidence that this program prevents farm injuries. 39 Other evaluations of education-based interventions confirms the poor outcome in terms of reducing occupational injuries in agriculture. [40][41][42] Further in-depth studies are needed on how these education-based interventions were planned and delivered, and how they were received by the target farming population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similarly, an evaluation of FarmSafe (the New Zealand Farm Safety Intervention program) concluded there was no evidence that this program prevents farm injuries. 39 Other evaluations of education-based interventions confirms the poor outcome in terms of reducing occupational injuries in agriculture. [40][41][42] Further in-depth studies are needed on how these education-based interventions were planned and delivered, and how they were received by the target farming population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There has been an over-reliance on employer self-management of safety risks in the workplace 9 34. The few targeted sector-based interventions have been short lived, had low uptake and failed to change patterns of injury 35. Failure to respond to consistently high rates of fatal injury sits with many actors within NZ’s safety system and future efforts to address these failures need to start with using the most comprehensive and detailed data available to inform effective, targeted injury prevention interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Par exemple, dans le cadre de la réalisation d'activités de désherbage ou de débroussaillage (Imbeau et al, 2010), de cueillette dans les champs (Chapman et al, 2008) ou pour la plantation d'arbres , des postures contraignantes en flexion et/ou torsion du tronc ont été documentées. L'étude de Houshyar et Kim (2018) La manutention manuelle de charges lourdes, sollicitant des efforts et l'exercice d'une force, a aussi été répertoriée dans d'autres études comme une contrainte physique de TMS, notamment lors des déchargements de poissons, de crabes, d'appâts ou de casiers de pêche (Lipscomb et al, 2004) ou encore en agriculture lors des récoltes (Chapman et al, 2008;Chubilleau et al, 2012;Cryer et al, 2009;Earle-Richardson et al, 2004 et des manipulations de caisses de fruits (Chapman et al, 2008;.…”
Section: La Problématique Des Troubles Musculo-squelettiques Auprès D...unclassified