2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-016-9275-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An outcome evaluation of the Methodist Home for Children’s value-based therapeutic environment model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regards to control group selection, twelve studies used a matched control, one used random allocation (Bahr et al 2015) and one randomly selected the control group (Forgays and DeMilio 2005). However only six of those studies using matched controls controlled for baseline differences (Caldwell and Rybroek 2001;Caldwell et al 2006;Farrington et al 2002;Haines et al 2015;Hoogsteder et al 2018;Strom et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…With regards to control group selection, twelve studies used a matched control, one used random allocation (Bahr et al 2015) and one randomly selected the control group (Forgays and DeMilio 2005). However only six of those studies using matched controls controlled for baseline differences (Caldwell and Rybroek 2001;Caldwell et al 2006;Farrington et al 2002;Haines et al 2015;Hoogsteder et al 2018;Strom et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants in seven of the studies resided in custodial placements. That is, three studies used participants from standard "young offender institutions" (Cann et al 2005;Farrington et al 2002;Hoogsteder et al 2018), one examined participants from placements described as "residential homes" (Strom et al 2017), and three consisted of therapeutic custodial placements (Caldwell and Rybroek 2001;Caldwell et al 2006;Ford and Hawke 2012). The two remaining studies recruited youth from both the community and custodial placements (Bahr et al 2015;Lindblom et al 2017).…”
Section: Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations