2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1982-21702014000300033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Outlier Detection Method in Geodetic Networks Based on the Original Observations

Abstract: The observations in geodetic networks are measured repetitively and in the network adjustment step, the mean values of these original observations are used. The mean operator is a kind of Least Square Estimation (LSE). LSE provides optimal results when random errors are normally distributed. If one of the original repetitive observations has outlier, the magnitude of this outlier will decrease because the mean value of these original observations is used in the network adjustment and outlier detection. In this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, there is a continuous research on outliers in geodetic networks. Among others, in addition to those papers already mentioned in this article, we can also cite: (Klein, Matsuoka and Souza 2011), (Baselga 2011), (Hekimoglu, Erdogan and Tunalioglu 2012), (Klein et al 2012), (Hekimoglu and Erdogan 2013), (Klein, Matsuoka and Monico 2013), (Erdogan 2014), (Guo 2015), (Klein, Matsuoka and Guzatto 2015), (Zhao and Gui 2017), (Rofatto, Matsuoka and Klein 2017), (Teunissen 2018) and (Rofatto, Matsuoka and Klein 2018).…”
Section: More Objective Considerations On Outliersmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Nevertheless, there is a continuous research on outliers in geodetic networks. Among others, in addition to those papers already mentioned in this article, we can also cite: (Klein, Matsuoka and Souza 2011), (Baselga 2011), (Hekimoglu, Erdogan and Tunalioglu 2012), (Klein et al 2012), (Hekimoglu and Erdogan 2013), (Klein, Matsuoka and Monico 2013), (Erdogan 2014), (Guo 2015), (Klein, Matsuoka and Guzatto 2015), (Zhao and Gui 2017), (Rofatto, Matsuoka and Klein 2017), (Teunissen 2018) and (Rofatto, Matsuoka and Klein 2018).…”
Section: More Objective Considerations On Outliersmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…MCS methods are used whenever the functional relationships are analytically not tractable, as is the case for Iterative Data Snooping procedure (Rüdiger Lehmann, 2012b). The MCS has already been applied in outlier detection (Lehmann & Scheffler, 2011;Klein et al, 2012;Klein et al, 2015;Erdogan, 2014;Niemeier & Tengen, 2017) The studies presented in this paper are a continuation of the first experiments presented by Rofatto et al (2017). However, unlike Rofatto et al, (2017), here in this paper we evaluate the proposed method in a geodetic network with uncorrelated observations and also we analyze the power of the test of Iterative Data Snooping procedure when outliers of magnitude equal to the MDB (Minimal Detectable Bias) are inserted into the geodetic network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle of the robust-M-estimation application is based on the iterative Least squares (LS) adjustment respecting the condition about gradual changes of the weights of individual observations (Třasák and Štroner, 2014). The LS is very sensitive to deviations from the model assumptions (Hampel et al, 1986) and it extends the effects of outliers to residuals of all observations (Hekimoglu et al, 2011(Hekimoglu et al, , 2014Hekimoglu and Erdogan, 2012;Erdogan, 2014). LS play an essential role in all methods of detecting outliers mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSR is given as the number of successes divided by the number of experiments (Hekimoglu andKoch, 1999, 2000). MSR is used for the efficiency measurements of outlier detection methods (Hekimoglu and Erenoglu, 2007;Erenoglu and Hekimoglu, 2010;Hekimoglu et al, 2011Hekimoglu et al, , 2014Erdogan, 2014) and methods of deformation analysis (Hekimoglu, Erdogan and Butterworth, 2010;Nowel, 2016;Sušić et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%