2017
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Outlook on Lithium Ion Battery Technology

Abstract: Lithium ion batteries as a power source are dominating in portable electronics, penetrating the electric vehicle market, and on the verge of entering the utility market for grid-energy storage. Depending on the application, trade-offs among the various performance parameters—energy, power, cycle life, cost, safety, and environmental impact—are often needed, which are linked to severe materials chemistry challenges. The current lithium ion battery technology is based on insertion-reaction electrodes and organic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
734
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,245 publications
(742 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
734
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[44] Interestingly, when the prepared cathodes were first charged to 4.45 V, we observed a small shoulder (at 528-533 eV) for LCO outer surface but not for LCNO (Figure 3j and Figure S20, Supporting Information), which indicates an suppressed oxidation of O 2− in LCNO surface during charge. [14] Consistently, there is less gas evolution for LCNO than LCO during first charge, as supported by in situ differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) data in Figure 3k. [41,46,47] Ni segregation helps in this regard, because the higher fraction of Ni on surface contributes to capacity without coupling to O 2p orbitals, due to the higher electronic energies of Ni 3+/4+ :e g compared to Co 3+/4+ :t 2g & O 2p resonant band.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[44] Interestingly, when the prepared cathodes were first charged to 4.45 V, we observed a small shoulder (at 528-533 eV) for LCO outer surface but not for LCNO (Figure 3j and Figure S20, Supporting Information), which indicates an suppressed oxidation of O 2− in LCNO surface during charge. [14] Consistently, there is less gas evolution for LCNO than LCO during first charge, as supported by in situ differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) data in Figure 3k. [41,46,47] Ni segregation helps in this regard, because the higher fraction of Ni on surface contributes to capacity without coupling to O 2p orbitals, due to the higher electronic energies of Ni 3+/4+ :e g compared to Co 3+/4+ :t 2g & O 2p resonant band.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…[5][6][7] As a result, in applications where volume is the most precious and price is less of a problem (e.g., in smartphones), LCO would still hold a large portion of the market in the near future. [14] The peroxide ion O 1− has higher ionic mobility than the oxide ion O 2− , and O 1− near the surface are especially prone to leaving the LCO particle, which can happen even when there is no external current (i.e., the battery is supposed to be holding its charge). [8][9][10][11][12][13] Extensive researches in the past decades seek to address this critical issue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Here, the evolution process of the AEI architecture on the graphite anode paired with different cathodes is revealed. [1] Here, the evolution process of the AEI architecture on the graphite anode paired with different cathodes is revealed.…”
Section: Anode Surface Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Exploration of next-generation rechargeable battery systems is thus critically needed. Traditional insertion-compound-based lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, as the dominant rechargeable battery technology, are approaching their limit of energy density and cannot meet the high-energy-density demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%