“…Knowledge on the taxonomy, ecology and distribution of many taxa encompassed by this study is of course prone to changes in the future. Taxonomic revisions are still an ongoing process for some challenging groups, such as the bee genera Andrena Fabricius, 1775 (Praz et al, 2022; Wood, 2021; Wood et al, 2021), Dasypoda Latreille, 1802 (Ghisbain et al 2023; Radchenko, 2016, 2017; Radchenko et al, 2019), Nomada Scopoli, 1770 (Smit, 2018), Osmia Panzer, 1806 (Müller, 2018, 2022b) and Hoplitis Klug, 1807 (Müller, 2014a; Müller & Mauss, 2016); and the hoverfly genera Merodon Meigen, 1803 (Vujić, Tot, et al 2021; Vujić, Likov, et al, 2021; Vujić, Radenković, et al, 2020; Vujić, Radenković, et al, 2021; Vujić, Speight, et al, 2020) and Eumerus Meigen, 1822 (Aguado‐Aranda et al, 2022; Grković et al, 2019, 2021). In these groups, the number of described species (including cryptic ones) is continuously increasing in part thanks to increased access to a large array of diagnostic methods such as DNA barcoding, semio‐chemical analysis and geometric morphometrics.…”