2015
DOI: 10.1080/15980316.2015.1027748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of depth distortion in stereoscopic 3D displays

Abstract: This article reviews how different presentation techniques of stereoscopic 3D (S3D) TVs affect depth perception. Many S3D TVs employ various interlacing techniques to present two eye views using one screen. The spatial or temporal interocular offsets introduced by these interlacing techniques can affect the image's perceived depth, resulting in depth distortion. Temporal interlacing delivers the two eye views with an interocular delay, which can be interpreted by the visual system as a horizontal disparity. Sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies showed the difference of stereoacuity value in glasses 15 and glasses-free stereotests or focused on the difference of depth perception in various types of glasses-type 3-D display systems. 16,17 However, the exact effect of the special glasses has been remained as an unsolved problem.…”
Section: Glasses-free Randot Stereotestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies showed the difference of stereoacuity value in glasses 15 and glasses-free stereotests or focused on the difference of depth perception in various types of glasses-type 3-D display systems. 16,17 However, the exact effect of the special glasses has been remained as an unsolved problem.…”
Section: Glasses-free Randot Stereotestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may include conflicts in perceived self-motion (vection) between two or more sensory systems (i.e., visual-vestibular systems), 1,2 or within a single sensory system (i.e., depth/space distortion as in S3D). 3,4 In our previous study, 5 multiple wearable devices were tested to identify potential physiological markers of VIMS onset (i.e., EEG, BP, HR) induced by virtual driving in a simulator. Although some physiological changes were measured between before and after the onset of VIMS, it was difficult to conclude that the differences found were caused by the VIMS onset alone, or by the physical interactions of driving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%