An overview of geospatial methods used in unintentional injury epidemiology

Abstract

BackgroundInjuries are a leading cause of death and disability around the world. Injury incidence is often associated with socio-economic and physical environmental factors. The application of geospatial methods has been recognised as important to gain greater understanding of the complex nature of injury and the associated diverse range of geographically-diverse risk factors. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to provide an overview of geospatial methods applied in unintentional injury epidemiological studies.MethodsNine electronic databases were searched for papers published in 2000–2015, inclusive. Included were papers reporting unintentional injuries using geospatial methods for one or more categories of spatial epidemiological methods (mapping; clustering/cluster detection; and ecological analysis). Results describe the included injury cause categories, types of data and details relating to the applied geospatial methods.ResultsFrom over 6,000 articles, 67 studies met all inclusion criteria. The major categories of injury data reported with geospatial methods were road traffic (n = 36), falls (n = 11), burns (n = 9), drowning (n = 4), and others (n = 7). Grouped by categories, mapping was the most frequently used method, with 62 (93%) studies applying this approach independently or in conjunction with other geospatial methods. Clustering/cluster detection methods were less common, applied in 27 (40%) studies. Three studies (4%) applied spatial regression methods (one study using a conditional autoregressive model and two studies using geographically weighted regression) to examine the relationship between injury incidence (drowning, road deaths) with aggregated data in relation to explanatory factors (socio-economic and environmental).ConclusionThe number of studies using geospatial methods to investigate unintentional injuries has increased over recent years. While the majority of studies have focused on road traffic injuries, other injury cause categories, particularly falls and burns, have also demonstrated the application of these methods. Geospatial investigations of injury have largely been limited to mapping of data to visualise spatial structures. Use of more sophisticated approaches will help to understand a broader range of spatial risk factors, which remain under-explored when using traditional epidemiological approaches.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40621-016-0097-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Importance of Place of Residence on Hospitalized Outcomes for Severely Injured Trauma Patients: A Trauma Registry Analysis

“…Regression modeling was done to examine the independent contribution of neighborhood patient factors responsible for both outcomes. 42 As the various definitions of "place" defining rurality and disadvantage were highly correlated, decisions to include any of these variables in the final multivariate models (for both outcomes) were made based on the statistical results from the goodness of fit in the model. The final models were built by entering the covariates one at time to enable a step-by-step assessment of the goodness of fit of the model, the statistical significance of the covariate in the model, and the presence of correlating variables.…”

Advancing health equity and access using telemedicine: a geospatial assessment

“…Overlay and intersection are used to build associations and assess the strength of those associations. [29][30][31][32] Applications range from quantifying the association between alcohol outlet density and violence 33 to monitoring climate changes. 34 Geospatial technologies have been used in health care to measure spatial accessibility to primary care in rural areas 34 or access to general health care.…”

Geospatial relationship of trauma and violent crime: An analysis of violent crime and trauma center utilization

“…Descriptive epidemiology, geographic distributions of trauma, socioeconomic status, and injury patterns have all been utilized to examine the effectiveness of trauma systems at providing care, but little has been done to study the relationship of violent crime to the incidence of trauma. 14,15…”