1968
DOI: 10.1080/00207284.1968.11508392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Group Therapy with Adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most recent review of all of the group literature for children and adolescents was Hoag and Burlingame's (1997) meta-analysis of 56 outcome studies that met their criteria, which were published between 1974 and 1997; Durlak and Wells's (1997) meta-analysis of the prevention literature reviewed 177 studies that met their criteria, reported by the end of 1991; Dagley et al's (1994) review of the group literature included the 27 studies that met their criteria, which were reported from 1980 to 1992. Several other reviews of the literature have been published, beginning in the late 1960s (Gazda & Larsen, 1968; Kraft, 1968); for a summation of these reviews, see Dagley et al (1994). Therefore, the only child and adolescent group research review that covers roughly the same time period as the present one is Hoag and Burlingame's; theirs was a broader review, covering all of the literature rather than focusing on a specific topic such as prevention, yet it was methodologically more rigorous owing to their use of the meta-analytic method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent review of all of the group literature for children and adolescents was Hoag and Burlingame's (1997) meta-analysis of 56 outcome studies that met their criteria, which were published between 1974 and 1997; Durlak and Wells's (1997) meta-analysis of the prevention literature reviewed 177 studies that met their criteria, reported by the end of 1991; Dagley et al's (1994) review of the group literature included the 27 studies that met their criteria, which were reported from 1980 to 1992. Several other reviews of the literature have been published, beginning in the late 1960s (Gazda & Larsen, 1968; Kraft, 1968); for a summation of these reviews, see Dagley et al (1994). Therefore, the only child and adolescent group research review that covers roughly the same time period as the present one is Hoag and Burlingame's; theirs was a broader review, covering all of the literature rather than focusing on a specific topic such as prevention, yet it was methodologically more rigorous owing to their use of the meta-analytic method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such literature that there is shows a steady increase in the use of group work both with children and adolescents but a dearth of information about what they set out to achieve, or whether they are successful (e.g. Kraft, 1968;Frank and Zilbach, 1968;Meeks, 1974;Abramowitz, 1976). Quite a lot has been written about group psychotherapists' personal experiences but what shines through the literature is the variation in approach and how different are the groups on which they base their experience.…”
Section: Steinberg J Merry and S Collins Group Work With Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group programs for children have focused on brief interpretive psychotherapy (Charach, 1983), combined activity and verbal therapy (Dannefer et al, 1975), and talking clubs (Sands & Golub, 1974). Kraft (1968), Berkowitz (1972, and Sugar (1979) focus on the client's developmental stage and how that influences the structure and dynamics of the group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%