2002
DOI: 10.1785/0120000819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Local Site Effects and the Associated Building Damage in Adapazari during the 17 August 1999 Izmit Earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into consideration the existence of several landfills in Lisbon (Dias 2013), numerical simulations were performed to compute the transfer functions of these deposits , 2014 in order to estimate their potential effect on building seismic response (Bakir et al 2002;Navarro et al 2012). From the computations it was observed that the effects of these superficial deposits are only significant when the deposits are more than 10 m thick and, due to their natural frequencies, for buildings with more than five floors.…”
Section: Building Vulnerability Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into consideration the existence of several landfills in Lisbon (Dias 2013), numerical simulations were performed to compute the transfer functions of these deposits , 2014 in order to estimate their potential effect on building seismic response (Bakir et al 2002;Navarro et al 2012). From the computations it was observed that the effects of these superficial deposits are only significant when the deposits are more than 10 m thick and, due to their natural frequencies, for buildings with more than five floors.…”
Section: Building Vulnerability Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominant period, which is defined as the period in which the maximum soil amplification (the highest peak amplitude of the H/V ratio curve) occurs, is used as a significant parameter in the assessment of building damage (Fallahi et al 2003, Gosar 2007, Chatelain et al 2008. Several authors have shown the dependent relationship between building damage and the correspondence between the natural period of buildings and the predominant period of the soil layers (Cranswick et al 2000, Navarro et al 2000, Bakir et al 2002, Oliveira et al 2006, Motamed et al 2007). Figure 6): (a) RC momentframe system for a four-story building built in Zone 1A in 1996, (b) RC moment-frame system for a five-story building built in Zone 1B in 1970, and (c) RC shear-wall system for a five-story building built in Zone 2 in 1986.…”
Section: Local Site Conditions H/v Spectral Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kramer (1996) emphasized that soil conditions affect the amplitude, frequency and duration of ground movements [2]. Some researchers indicated that damage on the alluvial soils are more significant than damage on the bedrock outcrops [3] [4]. This situation can be explained by amplification of the ground motion in an alluvial basin [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%