An Overview of Modular Car Architecture: the OEMS Perspective on Why and How

A modularly tailored commuter ferry platform

“…Since producing many tailored variants is expensive, rationalization is possible if each functional variant is based on a combination of basic modules and assemblies as part of a product-family in a ferry design-platform which offers high model variety with comparably low levels of complexity [49]. Ferries as a combination of standardization and customization have been termed flexibly standardized by [63]. Standardization is driven by the skeletal form of the ferry and defined modules while customization is driven by the PTP's choices under the operational requirements structure in Section 2.…”

“…since handling and transporting bigger modules risk in an over-proportional increase in logistics costs, [63].…”

“…The modules are envisaged to have standardized, accessible and well-defined interfaces that are connected kinematically [63] so that modules containing integrated components like cables and piping are connected securely. This is key to achieving geometric interdependence [5].…”

“…The interfaces must securely mount components while integrating piping and wiring between components. Such functionality enables the vessel to be future-proof allowing compatibility with modules [63].…”

“…While custom ferries make WPT efficient, they have high production costs and construction times, arising from an extensive design process involving manufacturing of custom-designed parts and a general absence of platform-based manufacturing. Typically, ferry construction can last several months to a year which can impede WPT's implementation and deter PTPs, leading them into adopting alternate modes as observed by [63] in the automotive industry.…”