2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0an01528h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of molecular biology and nanotechnology based analytical methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: promising biotools for the rapid diagnosis of COVID-19

Abstract: Molecular biology and nanotechnology based analytical methods have proven to be promising diagnostic tools for the rapid diagnosis of COVID-19.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also due to the fact that in contrast to other promising paper-based analytical platforms that mainly remain as laboratory prototypes, LFIA devices easily enter into real-life applications with a high market penetration mainly because they do not need extensive upgrades to become an end-user device [ 18 ]. The wide acceptance of LFIA devices also played an eminent role in the use of the platform for the detection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in the current pandemic situation, as we can still notice and as extensively reported in the literature [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also due to the fact that in contrast to other promising paper-based analytical platforms that mainly remain as laboratory prototypes, LFIA devices easily enter into real-life applications with a high market penetration mainly because they do not need extensive upgrades to become an end-user device [ 18 ]. The wide acceptance of LFIA devices also played an eminent role in the use of the platform for the detection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in the current pandemic situation, as we can still notice and as extensively reported in the literature [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… S. no. Method Read out time Sensitivity/Specificity References 1 RT-qPCR 4 h 71%/NA 29 , 115 2 RT-digital PCR 90%/100% 71 , 110 , 127 3 MNPs based RT-qPCR 30 min NA 43 , 141 4 LAMP-based colorimetric method 20–30 min 97.6% 107 , 136 5 CT Scan NA 97%/25% 2 , 87 , 108 6 LFICS-Au NPs colloid (IgM + IgG) 15 min 88.66%/90.63% 20 , 61 7 ELISA (IgM + IgG) 2 h 87.3%/100% 123 8 Chemiluminescence (total Ab)/Automated NA 86.9%/99.2% 51 , 122 9 CRISPR-based assay 30–40 min 95%/100% …”
Section: Current Biosensing Techniques Focused On Covid-19 Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical sensitivity and versatility have made LFIA the most commercially available POC diagnostic platform (Nardo et al 2021; 2). The wide acceptance of LFIA platform has also played a prominent role in the detection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Espejo et al 2020;Ruhan et al 2020;Zhu and Woong 2020;Deeks et al 2020;Dinnes et al 2020;Vashist 2020;Mekonnen et al 2020;Kailasa et al 2021;Antiochia 2021;Ernst et al 2021) (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Lateral Flow Immunoassaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advancement in LFIA technology is the development of multiplex systems or format which allows the detection of various bacterial or viral antigens in a single assay (Nardo et al 2021 ; Andryukov 2020 ; Jørgensen et al 2015 ) (Table 2 ). The wide acceptance of LFIA platform has also played a prominent role in the detection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Espejo et al 2020 ; Ruhan et al 2020 ; Zhu and Woong 2020 ; Deeks et al 2020 ; Dinnes et al 2020 ; Vashist 2020 ; Mekonnen et al 2020 ; Kailasa et al 2021 ; Antiochia 2021 ; Ernst et al 2021 ) (Fig. 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%