2014
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a014357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of MYC and Its Interactome

Abstract: This review is intended to provide a broad outline of the biological and molecular functions of MYC as well as of the larger protein network within which MYC operates. We present a view of MYC as a sensor that integrates multiple cellular signals to mediate a broad transcriptional response controlling many aspects of cell behavior. We also describe the larger transcriptional network linked to MYC with emphasis on the MXD family of MYC antagonists. Last, we discuss evidence that the network has evolved for mill… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
421
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(429 citation statements)
references
References 237 publications
(253 reference statements)
6
421
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Myc proteins function within a transcription factor network (Figure 1A)(Conacci-Sorrell et al, 2014). These proteins form heterodimers with the small bHLHZ protein Max, which bind to E-Box sequences in DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myc proteins function within a transcription factor network (Figure 1A)(Conacci-Sorrell et al, 2014). These proteins form heterodimers with the small bHLHZ protein Max, which bind to E-Box sequences in DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MYC's primary mode of deregulation in cancer is through altered levels of MYC protein, resulting in deregulated MYC activity. A broad spectrum of cellular roles has been attributed to MYC in cancer, including regulation of cell cycle, cell proliferation, response to growth factors, ribosome biogenesis, protein synthesis, cell adhesion and cytoskeleton, angiogenesis, metabolic pathways, apoptosis, DNA replication, mRNA capping, and chromatin structure (Amati et al 1998(Amati et al , 2001Facchini and Penn 1998;Nilsson and Cleveland 2003;Hurlin and Dezfouli 2004;Secombe et al 2004;Gallant 2005;Bernard and Eilers 2006;Dang et al 2006Dang et al , 2009Kuttler and Mai 2006;Meyer et al 2006;Cole 2007, 2010; Lebofsky and Walter 2007;Nieminen et al 2007;Shchors and Evan 2007;Sutphin et al 2007;Cole and Cowling 2008;Dai and Lu 2008;Eilers and Eisenman 2008;Hoffman and Liebermann 2008;Meyer and Penn 2008;Prochownik 2008;Herold et al 2009;Lin et al 2009;Ruggero 2009;Singh and Dalton 2009;Dang 2010;van Riggelen et al 2010;Hanahan and Weinberg 2011;Peterson and Ayer 2012;Conacci-Sorrell et al 2013). How does oncogenic MYC activity produce these broad effects?…”
Section: Myc Oncogenic Activity Alters Cellular Gene Expression Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it seemed at the time that identification of MYC target genes would be fairly straightforward, and that the identity of its key targets would explain MYC-driven phenotypes in away that proapoptotic (e.g., Puma and Noxa) and antiproliferation (e.g., p21) targets account for the major tumor suppressive effects of p53 (Lowe et al 2004). These hopes for clarity never materialized (see Conacci-Sorrell et al 2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%