2011
DOI: 10.1080/08963568.2011.554786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Open Access in the Fields of Business and Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study confirmed what previous studies (e.g., Coonin, 2011;Coonin & Younce, 2010;Harley, Acord, Earl-Novell, Lawrence & King, 2010;Kozak & Hartley, 2013;Lyons & Booth, 2011;Moore, 2011) have noted: that disciplinary differences exist in attitudes to OA journal publishing, While arts and humanities, science and health science and social science participants conveyed a range of knowledge and attitudes about OA journal publishing, business faculty displayed a level of certainty and negativity that stood out. Business researchers were most likely to feel that they would never publish in an OA journal, that current tenure and promotion guidelines discouraged publication in OA journals, and were almost unanimous in their belief that OA journals were of lower quality than subscription journals.…”
Section: The Value Of Open Accesssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This study confirmed what previous studies (e.g., Coonin, 2011;Coonin & Younce, 2010;Harley, Acord, Earl-Novell, Lawrence & King, 2010;Kozak & Hartley, 2013;Lyons & Booth, 2011;Moore, 2011) have noted: that disciplinary differences exist in attitudes to OA journal publishing, While arts and humanities, science and health science and social science participants conveyed a range of knowledge and attitudes about OA journal publishing, business faculty displayed a level of certainty and negativity that stood out. Business researchers were most likely to feel that they would never publish in an OA journal, that current tenure and promotion guidelines discouraged publication in OA journals, and were almost unanimous in their belief that OA journals were of lower quality than subscription journals.…”
Section: The Value Of Open Accesssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These figures can be compared to 21 % for Information Systems research , 26 % for Library Information Systems (Way 2010) and 36 % for Business and Management (Lyons and Booth 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charles and Booth 2011;Miguel et al 2013), however, there are fewer on the estimation of the rate of open access availability of journal articles in different subject fields. Björk et al (2010) studied a random sample of 1837 articles and searched them using Google.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 97%