“…PI and PIS can be categorized into ultraviolet (UV, below 400 nm), visible light (400–700 nm), and near-infrared (NIR, beyond 700 nm) types based on emission wavelength of the light source, , with UV type being the most widely used nowadays. However, UV-type PI and PIS have faced limitations due to drawbacks of UV sources such as high energy consumption, short lifetime, and release of ozone. ,,− In comparison, the PI and PIS of visible and NIR types have shown a tendency to replace UV types due to the specific characteristics offered by visible and NIR light sources. For instance, visible light sources, mainly light-emitting diodes (LED), offer advantages such as longer lifetime, lower energy consumption, and zero ozone release. − Similarly, NIR light sources also possess distinctive traits such as exceptional penetration, human safety, and extra heat. , Therefore, NIR PIS have gained significant attention in recent years, and the current reports mainly focus on those based on the NIR dyes ,− and upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs). ,− In summary, it is necessary to research novel PI and PIS activated by visible or NIR light sources as traditional UV type have limited absorption in the visible light range, let alone NIR.…”