2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.10694
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of rationalization theories of non-simply connected spaces and non-nilpotent groups

Abstract: We give an overview of four rationalization theories for spaces (Bousfield-Kan's Q-completion; Bousfield's homology rationalization; Casacuberta-Peschke's Ω-rationalization; Gómez-Tato-Halperin-Tanré's π 1 -fiberwise rationalization) that extend the classical rationalization of simply connected spaces. We also give an overview of the corresponding rationalization theories for groups (Q-completion; HQ-localization; Baumslag rationalization) that extend the classical Malcev completion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In work of Malcev [93], Lazard [84], and Hilton [71] (see also [22], [72], [74]), this construction was extended to arbitrary nilpotent groups. The Malcev completion functor is left adjoint to the embedding of the category of rational nilpotent groups into the category of nilpotent groups.…”
Section: Malcev Completionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In work of Malcev [93], Lazard [84], and Hilton [71] (see also [22], [72], [74]), this construction was extended to arbitrary nilpotent groups. The Malcev completion functor is left adjoint to the embedding of the category of rational nilpotent groups into the category of nilpotent groups.…”
Section: Malcev Completionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To every space , Sullivan [135], [137], [138] associated in a functorial way its rationalization, denoted Q ; we refer to [21], [53], [51], [120], and [74] for more details on this construction. The rationalization of may be viewed as a geometric realization of the Sullivan minimal model, M ( ), for the PL ( ).…”
Section: Rationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%