2023
DOI: 10.1111/hir.12509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of the capabilities of ChatGPT for medical writing and its implications for academic integrity

Huihui Liu,
Mehreen Azam,
Salman Bin Naeem
et al.

Abstract: The artificial intelligence (AI) tool ChatGPT, which is based on a large language model (LLM), is gaining popularity in academic institutions, notably in the medical field. This article provides a brief overview of the capabilities of ChatGPT for medical writing and its implications for academic integrity. It provides a list of AI generative tools, common use of AI generative tools for medical writing, and provides a list of AI generative text detection tools. It also provides recommendations for policymakers,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in the field of medicine demonstrate that ChatGPT can produce high-quality scientific abstracts, which are difficult for reviewers to distinguish [ 36 ]. To address this issue, several reliable AI tools have been developed to recognize the texts generated by ChatGPT, and the utilization of such AI tools can diminish the probability of students and academics submitting texts solely generated by ChatGPT [ 23 ]. However, it is unclear how ChatGPT deals with misinformation and plagiarism [ 22 ], and privacy concerns and bias are also discussed as potential risks when using ChatGPT in a scientific context [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies in the field of medicine demonstrate that ChatGPT can produce high-quality scientific abstracts, which are difficult for reviewers to distinguish [ 36 ]. To address this issue, several reliable AI tools have been developed to recognize the texts generated by ChatGPT, and the utilization of such AI tools can diminish the probability of students and academics submitting texts solely generated by ChatGPT [ 23 ]. However, it is unclear how ChatGPT deals with misinformation and plagiarism [ 22 ], and privacy concerns and bias are also discussed as potential risks when using ChatGPT in a scientific context [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the major risks related to AI in midwifery education are misinformation and plagiarism [ 22 ]. Whereas AI-generated content can be detected by several reliable AI tools [ 23 ], privacy concerns are still a major threat when using AI technologies such as ChatGPT (Generative Pretrained Transformer [ 24 ]) in education. These technologies use the data entered to train the model itself [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second layer was the editorial oversight, which should have flagged the issue before the paper was even sent for peer review. Currently, numerous AI solutions, such as GPTZero, Turnitin AI detection, and AI Detector Pro, have been created for students, research mentors, educators, journal editors, and others to identify texts produced by ChatGPT, though the majority of these tools operate on a subscription model [ 44 ]. The third layer was the peer-review process itself, intended to be a stringent evaluation of a paper’s merit and originality.…”
Section: Ai’s Unethical Role In Scholarly Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly noteworthy is the emergence of products like ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2022), signaling a new era for the deployment of general-domain AI 6 . Currently, LLMs have demonstrated promising applications in various areas of medical research, including diagnostics 7 , medical image analysis 8 , medical writing 9 , and personalized medicine 10 . The Medical Licensing Examination is commonly used to assess the performance of LLMs in the medical eld due to its high standardization, regulation, and comprehensive coverage of various subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%