2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-01818-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of the Discontinuous Petrov Galerkin Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [44] (and subsequent papers) the polynomial part of the space was dropped, and then since there was no longer any "enrichment," the method was called a DG method (and abbreviated to DGM); see [44, of 1 , the method defines so-called optimal test spaces 2 N of 2 ; these optimal test spaces are such that, when the sesquilinear form satisfies the inf-sup condition (6.40), the discrete infsup condition (6.46) is automatically satisfied; see, e.g., [59,Proposition 5]. These optimal test spaces admit functions with no continuity constraints across element interfaces, hence the "discontinuous" in "DPG" [59,Definition 16], [29,Section 3]. In practice, the optimal test spaces are not computed exactly (since this would require solving BVPs on each K ∈ ) but instead are approximated [59,Section 3].…”
Section: The Dg Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [44] (and subsequent papers) the polynomial part of the space was dropped, and then since there was no longer any "enrichment," the method was called a DG method (and abbreviated to DGM); see [44, of 1 , the method defines so-called optimal test spaces 2 N of 2 ; these optimal test spaces are such that, when the sesquilinear form satisfies the inf-sup condition (6.40), the discrete infsup condition (6.46) is automatically satisfied; see, e.g., [59,Proposition 5]. These optimal test spaces admit functions with no continuity constraints across element interfaces, hence the "discontinuous" in "DPG" [59,Definition 16], [29,Section 3]. In practice, the optimal test spaces are not computed exactly (since this would require solving BVPs on each K ∈ ) but instead are approximated [59,Section 3].…”
Section: The Dg Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of variable material coefficients, see [1]. We remark that the proposed Petrov-Galerkin shares some properties with the discontinuous Petrov-Galerkin method [2,3], and it appears worth investigating these connections in future work.…”
Section: Definition Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the use of different test norms to stabilize convection-diffusion problems was further investigated in [14]. Interestingly, the idea of residual minimization in nonstandard dual norms is also at the heart of the recent Discontinuous Petrov-Galerkin (DPG) methods (see, e.g., [40,20,15], and [19] for a general overview). Alternatively, several strategies based on fluctuation stabilization exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%