2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/8135724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of the Molecular Methods in the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infectious Diseases

Abstract: Gastrointestinal infectious diseases are very common worldwide and an important cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in infants in developing countries. Diarrhea and other intestinal infections are caused by a wide range of bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and parasites. Conventional diagnosis of these infections is performed by culture, microscopy, and antigen detection immunoassays. The traditional culture and microscopy procedures are time-consuming, lack sensitivity, and require special laboratory se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morphological methods are frequently being executed first and then the molecular approaches are applied next. Furthermore, this trend is not an exclusive feature of oral fungal identification but is a trend in the entire field of microbiology and its subset mycology [ 8 , 76 79 ]. Figure 3(a ) shows that the morphological methods were the most used in the period from 2009 to 2014 and these were followed by the sugar fermentation and assimilation tests in the same period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological methods are frequently being executed first and then the molecular approaches are applied next. Furthermore, this trend is not an exclusive feature of oral fungal identification but is a trend in the entire field of microbiology and its subset mycology [ 8 , 76 79 ]. Figure 3(a ) shows that the morphological methods were the most used in the period from 2009 to 2014 and these were followed by the sugar fermentation and assimilation tests in the same period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the multiplex NAATs that are CE marked but not FDA cleared are the Allplex™ Gastrointestinal Panel (Seegene, Seoul, South Korea), a multiplex assay with 23 targets including six parasites ( C. cayetanensis , Blastocystis sp., Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis , E. histolytica , and G. duodenalis ) [ 51 ] and the QIAstat-Dx ® Gastrointestinal Panel (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), which has 21 targets including four parasites ( C. cayetanensis , Cryptosporidium spp., E. histolytica , and G. duodenalis ) [ 51 ]. Similarly, the EasyScreen™ Enteric Protozoan Extended Detection Kit (Genetic Signatures, Newtown, Australia) has six protozoan and microsporidial targets, including C. cayetanensis .…”
Section: Molecular Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culturing most viruses that cause diarrhea is difficult. Other techniques for virus identification such as electron microscopy and immunoassay demand special expertise which is often lacking in many clinical diagnostic laboratories [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based testing has been recently added to the list of microbiological diagnostic tools for several infectious diseases. It allows rapid and simultaneous amplification of several targets with good sensitivity and specificity [ 5 , 7 ]. Although used in some tertiary hospitals in the UAE, this method, has not yet been evaluated at a population level, where co-infections, as well as asymptomatic carriage of pathogens may exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%