2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2905070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview Of The Motional Stark Effect Diagnostic On DIII-D And Design Work For An ITER MSE

Abstract: Abstract. The advanced tokamak research program at DIII-D relies critically on the measurement of the current density profile. This was made possible by the development of a Motional Stark Effect (MSE) polarimeter that was first installed in 1992. Three major upgrades have since occurred, and improvements in our understanding of critical performance issues and calibration techniques are ongoing. In parallel with these improvements, we have drawn on our DIII-D experience to begin studies and design work for MSE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fast ion pressure in the pedestal region is negligible but can contribute significantly to the plasma core pressure. The core current density profile is determined by the motional Stark effect (MSE) diagnostic [45]. The flux surface average toroidal current density profile in the pedestal region is obtained as the sum of the parallel bootstrap current calculated with the NEO code [46,47], the Ohmic current density, and the neutral beam driven current, minus a small poloidal current.…”
Section: Experimental Setup Profile Fitting and Mhd Equilibrium Gener...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fast ion pressure in the pedestal region is negligible but can contribute significantly to the plasma core pressure. The core current density profile is determined by the motional Stark effect (MSE) diagnostic [45]. The flux surface average toroidal current density profile in the pedestal region is obtained as the sum of the parallel bootstrap current calculated with the NEO code [46,47], the Ohmic current density, and the neutral beam driven current, minus a small poloidal current.…”
Section: Experimental Setup Profile Fitting and Mhd Equilibrium Gener...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the optical system is complex and sensitive, requiring precise calibration. Additionally, its reliance on neutral beam injection (NBI) and restrictions on the observation space are factors that cannot be overlooked [34][35][36][37]. Due to the potential sensitivities and uncertainties associated with diagnostic methods, our approach of refining equilibrium calculations, as will be demonstrated in section 4, is applicable regardless of the availability of the diagnostics from MSE or POINT.…”
Section: Current Constraint Of East Equilibrium Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the fast ion pressure, is negligible in the pedestal while it could contribute significantly to the core pressure. The core current density is constrained by the MSE diagnostic [44] while the edge current density profile is calculated based the ONETWOtime module, as the sum of the parallel bootstrap current estimated from the Sauter model [45,46], the Ohmic current density and the neutral beam driven current. Then an iteration was carried out and the total pedestal pressure is readjusted to match the recomputed kinetic equilibrium and the pedestal current density is recalculated to resolve the effects of the flux geometry.…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%