2019
DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2019.00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
193
0
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
2
193
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This process contrasts with another rock-based carbon sequestration method where fluids would have to be mechanically pumped through ophiolite peridotite on land (e.g., Kelemen & Matter, 2008). Rates of sequestration needed for near term societal impact might require concentrated CO 2 fluid injection, which would clearly increase cost (Kelemen et al, 2019). As pointed out by Goldberg and Slagle (2009), deep ocean basalt sequestration has enormous potential in terms of reservoir size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process contrasts with another rock-based carbon sequestration method where fluids would have to be mechanically pumped through ophiolite peridotite on land (e.g., Kelemen & Matter, 2008). Rates of sequestration needed for near term societal impact might require concentrated CO 2 fluid injection, which would clearly increase cost (Kelemen et al, 2019). As pointed out by Goldberg and Slagle (2009), deep ocean basalt sequestration has enormous potential in terms of reservoir size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tendency of minerals to react with CO 2 under the right conditions can be harnessed for CCUS, using both in situ and ex situ processing methods. By way of example of the former, Kelemen et al (2019) report the application of CO 2 -rich fluid rather than natural water, in the in situ treatment of peridotite. In this approach, the dissolution of peridotite (and hence its carbonate-ability) can be increased by five orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Carbon Capture Utilization and Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The options shown in Table 4 can retain acceptable costs while scaling for the safe sequestration of trillions of tonnes of liquid CO 2 produced by the HTL and Allam Cycle power plants. They include geologic CO 2 sequestration in depleted oil and gas wells and brine aquifers [59,127,128] and mineralization in olivine, basalt, and other rocks on land [8, [129][130][131][132][133] and in the sub-seafloor [134]. Other authors have analyzed secure contained seafloor storage either as liquid [135] or as CO 2 -hydrate [136][137][138].…”
Section: Co 2 Sequestration Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The actual mineralization rate depends on the characteristics of the local rocks [133,139]. See SMD for maps and discussion of different types of rocks with more references [132,134,140]. 8 Contained seabed storage scale and injection rate is essentially unlimited.…”
Section: Co 2 Sequestration Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%