2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10142-020-00755-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of the transcriptional responses of two tolerant and susceptible sugarcane cultivars to borer (Diatraea saccharalis) infestation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the resistant line had comparatively more DEGs than did the susceptible line under P. xanthii invasion. This finding was similar to those found in previous transcriptomic studies in sorghum, sugarcane and wheat, in which resistant lines induced expression of more DEGs than did susceptible lines under biotic stress ( Kiani and Szczepaniec, 2018 ; De Mello et al, 2020 ; Kiani et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this study, the resistant line had comparatively more DEGs than did the susceptible line under P. xanthii invasion. This finding was similar to those found in previous transcriptomic studies in sorghum, sugarcane and wheat, in which resistant lines induced expression of more DEGs than did susceptible lines under biotic stress ( Kiani and Szczepaniec, 2018 ; De Mello et al, 2020 ; Kiani et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results indicated that the resistant wheat responds to the mite feeding by eliciting a higher number of unique responses than the susceptible genotype. A higher number of DEGs in the resistant genotype in response to herbivory has been reported in several other species, such as in resistant sugarcane in response sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) infestation [ 39 ], and in sorghum in response to sugarcane aphid sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari Zehtner (Hemiptera: Aphididae) [ 40 ], suggesting that resistant plants undergo significantly greater metabolic changes, which may help them respond more effectively to herbivory by activating defense-related genes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Sequence reads were imported into the CLC Genomics Workbench version 20 (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and mapped to two versions of Triticum aestivum reference genomes, including Triticum aestivum v2.2 ( ; accessed on 6 January 2020 [ 39 ]) and IWGS RefSeq v.1.0 ( ; accessed on 6 January 2020 [ 40 ]). Based on the total read counts for each annotated gene, differential gene expression analyses were conducted using the Empirical Analysis of the DGE tool, which implements the “Exact Test” for two group comparisons [ 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the green control of the stem borer has received a lot of attention from the community ( Gao et al, 2016 ; Cristofoletti et al, 2018 ). At present, researchers engaged in microbiome control have screened out parasitic microorganisms, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa , that had significant killing power against the pest for control purposes ( Chen et al, 2012 ; Cristofoletti et al, 2018 ; de Mello et al, 2020 ). However, the activity of microbiome pesticides varies from region to region due to several factors such as geography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%