2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-326x(01)00251-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of toxicant identification in sediments and dredged materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
4
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
70
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…High concentrations of APs were reported for other highly industrialized and urbanized areas, such as Hamilton Harbor of the Great Lakes (up to 72,000 ng/g dw of NP and 1800 ng/g dw of OP) [38], Virginia (USA) sediments adjacent to STPs and outfall (up to 14,100 ng/g dw) [23], and Jamaica Bay (NY, USA)(up to 13,700 ng/g dw of NP and 45 ng/g dw of OP) [25]. How- ever, the concentrations of NP and OP in surface sediments from the Pearl River estuary and nearby South China Sea ranged from 59 to 571 ng/g dw for NP and from 1 to 18 ng/g dw for OP [20], which were comparable to those found in Tokyo Bay (120-640 ng/g dw of NP and 6-10 ng/g dw of OP) [10]. The above result suggests that the Pearl River System has been significantly polluted by APs, and the contamination level in the PRD is one of the highest in the world.…”
Section: Ap Contents By Soxhlet Extraction and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High concentrations of APs were reported for other highly industrialized and urbanized areas, such as Hamilton Harbor of the Great Lakes (up to 72,000 ng/g dw of NP and 1800 ng/g dw of OP) [38], Virginia (USA) sediments adjacent to STPs and outfall (up to 14,100 ng/g dw) [23], and Jamaica Bay (NY, USA)(up to 13,700 ng/g dw of NP and 45 ng/g dw of OP) [25]. How- ever, the concentrations of NP and OP in surface sediments from the Pearl River estuary and nearby South China Sea ranged from 59 to 571 ng/g dw for NP and from 1 to 18 ng/g dw for OP [20], which were comparable to those found in Tokyo Bay (120-640 ng/g dw of NP and 6-10 ng/g dw of OP) [10]. The above result suggests that the Pearl River System has been significantly polluted by APs, and the contamination level in the PRD is one of the highest in the world.…”
Section: Ap Contents By Soxhlet Extraction and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…4-Nonylphenol (NP) and 4-tert-octylphenol (OP) are more toxic and persistent than their ethoxylated precursors [7]. The concern over ubiquitous APs in the environment has been increasing due to their toxicity [8][9][10], estrogenic activity [11][12][13], and massive use. It was reported that the annual production of NP approximately reached 45,000 tons in the EU [14] and 16,000 tons in China [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, alguns valores de concentração indicam que o sedimento da bacia do Tarumã-Açu seja considerado poluído em alguns paises, principalmente nas proximidades do aterro sanitário (Tabela 5), representando um risco para a vida aquática, saúde humana (Ho et al, 2002).…”
Section: Estudo De Metais Na áGuaunclassified
“…4.2.4.4 Influence of ammonia toxicity in other porewater testing Ho et al (2002) reviewed the available published literature for porewater and wholesediment toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) testing to determine if one or more groups of contaminants (e.g., metals versus PAHs) were responsible for observed toxicity. Ammonia was identified as a contributory toxic agent in 69% of the porewater TIE studies (and was the sole toxic agent in 23% of the porewater TIE studies).…”
Section: Asterisk Indicates the Citation Used For The M Galloprovincmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the number of studies included in the review was relatively small (i.e., n = 13 for porewater; n = 5 for whole-sediment), it does indicate the potential magnitude of the influence of ammonia in porewater testing. Ho et al (2002) suggested that the influence of ammonia may be an artifact of the test system (i.e., ammonia is water soluble, and therefore more likely to result in over-exposure in a porewater sample).…”
Section: Asterisk Indicates the Citation Used For The M Galloprovincmentioning
confidence: 99%