“…Dependent upon the feedstock, the biocrudes produced from the HTL process also contain a considerable amount of heteroatom content other than oxygen [i.e., nitrogen (∼0.1–7 wt % N) and sulfur (∼0–2 wt % S)] ,,, and also a high inorganic content (∼0.1–0.6 wt %). , Overall, this makes HTL biocrude a highly complex mixture, containing phenols, alcohols, fatty acids, carbonyls, and other oxygenated compounds of a diverse nature (O x , O x N x , O x S x , etc. species). − Inevitably, this entails high viscosity/density, high total acid number (up to ∼100 mg of KOH/g TAN), high microcarbon residue (MCR), low H/C atomic ratio, low calorific value, immiscibility with fossil products, and poor chemical/thermal stability of biocrudes and incorporates undesirable fuel properties in refinery context. − Therefore, raw biocrudes are intermediate energy carriers and require further refining to enhance physicochemical properties, drop-in fuel potential, and co-feeding compatibility in an existing refinery infrastructure. ,, In recent years, because of low capital investment, the co-processing of renewable feedstocks (e.g., HTL biocrudes) is of high interest and a ready-to-use approach for refineries. ,, Because most of the studies in the literature represent the stand-alone hydroprocessing of biocrudes, ,, therefore, in co-processing, the main concern is the limited scientific results covering the insertion point of biocrudes in already existing refineries.…”