“…Given the similar settings, vein paragenesis, and fluid chemistry, as constrained by isotopes (S, O, D, C), fluid inclusions (i.e., aqueous carbonic, X CO2 = 0.10-0.2, 5-10 wt% equiv. NaCl), and wall-rock al Kontak et al, 1990bKontak et al, , 1993Kontak and Smith, 1993;Kontak and Kerrich, 1995;Chen, 2015 Kontak et al, 1990bKontak et al, , 1993Bierlein and Smith, 2003;Chen, 2015 Cochrane Hill teration, these deposits have been suggested to share a metamorphic origin (e.g., Graves and Zentilli, 1982;Kontak et al, 1990aKontak et al, , 2011Kontak and Kerrich, 1997;Ryan and Smith, 1998;Kontak and Horne, 2010). However, direct dating (Re Os, 40 Ar/ 39 Ar) of some deposits indicate at least two distinct gold mineralizing events (see summary in Table 2): 1) an early one, coincident with regional deformation and recognized locally at Beaver Dam, The Ovens, and Touquoy deposits based on Re/Os dating of arsenopyrite grains (e.g., Morelli et al, 2005;Chen et al, 2014;Chen, 2015); and 2) a later event, which overlaps the felsic(−mafic) magmatism at ca.…”