2023
DOI: 10.3390/rs15092434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ROI Optimization Method Based on Dynamic Estimation Adjustment Model

Abstract: An important research direction in the field of traffic light recognition of autonomous systems is to accurately obtain the region of interest (ROI) of the image through the multi-sensor assisted method. Dynamic evaluation of the performance of the multi-sensor (GNSS, IMU, and odometer) fusion positioning system to obtain the optimum size of the ROI is essential for further improvement of recognition accuracy. In this paper, we propose a dynamic estimation adjustment (DEA) model construction method to optimize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the three sets of data, PDF1, PDF2, and PDF3, the RM set to 0.3 m/s, and the distribution characteristics gradually evolved toward the Ga distribution as the velocity increased. At the same time, in the two sets of data, PD PDF4, the velocity value was 3.754 m/s, and when the RMSE was reduced from 0.3 0.03 m/s, the distribution characteristics became closer to the Gaussian distributio shows that as the error-to-true value ratio decreases, the measurement noise error will gradually evolve from a Rayleigh distribution to an approximate Gaussian distri In our previous research [34], using a simulation platform, we conducted a d analysis of the changes in the velocity and variance function relationship curves Based on the vehicle speed and innovation data distribution characteristics in 2, a convergence function 𝑦 = 𝑓 (π‘₯) is fitted, and the data regions satisfying the r ship, 𝑦 β‰₯ 𝑓 (π‘₯) and 𝑦 𝑓 (π‘₯), are divided into the AGFR and the AGCR, respecti the AGFR, the nonlinearity of the speed and variance relationship function is re strong, and a neural network is suitable for fitting and solving. In the AGCR, th mation sequence has converged, and it can be estimated according to the Gaussian bution.…”
Section: Approximate Gaussian Distribution Analysis Of Gnss/odometry ...mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the three sets of data, PDF1, PDF2, and PDF3, the RM set to 0.3 m/s, and the distribution characteristics gradually evolved toward the Ga distribution as the velocity increased. At the same time, in the two sets of data, PD PDF4, the velocity value was 3.754 m/s, and when the RMSE was reduced from 0.3 0.03 m/s, the distribution characteristics became closer to the Gaussian distributio shows that as the error-to-true value ratio decreases, the measurement noise error will gradually evolve from a Rayleigh distribution to an approximate Gaussian distri In our previous research [34], using a simulation platform, we conducted a d analysis of the changes in the velocity and variance function relationship curves Based on the vehicle speed and innovation data distribution characteristics in 2, a convergence function 𝑦 = 𝑓 (π‘₯) is fitted, and the data regions satisfying the r ship, 𝑦 β‰₯ 𝑓 (π‘₯) and 𝑦 𝑓 (π‘₯), are divided into the AGFR and the AGCR, respecti the AGFR, the nonlinearity of the speed and variance relationship function is re strong, and a neural network is suitable for fitting and solving. In the AGCR, th mation sequence has converged, and it can be estimated according to the Gaussian bution.…”
Section: Approximate Gaussian Distribution Analysis Of Gnss/odometry ...mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Figure 1. The residual sequence distribution characteristics.In our previous research[34], using a simulation platform, we conducted a detailed analysis of the changes in the velocity and variance function relationship curves during the uniform acceleration of a vehicle from [0 m/s, 0 m/s] to [6 m/s, 3 m/s] for nine sets of GNSS velocity RMSE values. The results are shown in Figure2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%