2007
DOI: 10.1029/2007gl030317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An S receiver function analysis of the lithospheric structure in South America

Abstract: [1] We make use of S receiver function to investigate the structure and thickness of the crust and mantle lithosphere in the South American continent and adjacent areas. The Moho discontinuity has been detected at all stations and goes from 18 km beneath the coast of the continent to 80 km in the Andean region. The depth of the lithosphereasthenosphere boundary can be clearly detected below those stations that are located on stable areas from 50 km to 160 km. The identification of this phase becomes more diffi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
109
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
20
109
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be due to the fact that the observations are more representative of the islands. The LAB depth found below RPN is consistent with the results obtained earlier from S receiver functions (Heit et al, 2007;Li, et al, 2003). This study suggests that the numerical value corresponding to the negative discontinuity below RPN might correspond to an oceanic LAB.…”
Section: Rano Kau Ridge (Rpn) and Macquarie Ridge (Mcq)supporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be due to the fact that the observations are more representative of the islands. The LAB depth found below RPN is consistent with the results obtained earlier from S receiver functions (Heit et al, 2007;Li, et al, 2003). This study suggests that the numerical value corresponding to the negative discontinuity below RPN might correspond to an oceanic LAB.…”
Section: Rano Kau Ridge (Rpn) and Macquarie Ridge (Mcq)supporting
confidence: 81%
“…2, 4 and 5) show an additional negative phase for stations RPN, ROSA and ASCN. We interpret the shallower LVLs as conversions from the LAB, since they are consistent with previous receiver function studies (Li et al, 2003;Heit et al, 2007;Rychert and Shearer, 2009 etc.). These values are close to those predicted by the cooling model for the ocean lithosphere.…”
Section: Sub-lithospheric Low-velocity Layersupporting
confidence: 70%
“…2;Whitman et al 1992;Whitman 1994;Dorbath et al 1993;Beck et al 1996;Beck and Zandt 2002;Lyon-Caen et al 1985;Watts et al 1995;Stewart and Watts 1997;Myers et al 1998;Yuan et al 2000Yuan et al , 2002Tassara 2005;Heit et al 2007;Pérez-Gussinyé et al 2008;Tassara and Echaurren 2012). These show that the high Andes form a broad region, ϳ500 km wide, where the thick crust is up to 75 km thick, but the lithosphere is less than 100 km thick.…”
Section: Lithospheric Profilesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In our case, the Moho depth along 21˚ is from receiver function data (Yuan et al, 2000 andHeit et al, 2007 andWoelbern et al, 2007).…”
Section: Preparation Of the Residualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define the top of the subducted slab as an envelope of seismicity (hypocenters) located by Engdahl et al (1998) (Figure 8A). The shape of the slab is also defined by receiver function data from the ReFuCA dataset Heit et al, 2007;Woelbern et al, 2007). The thickness of the oceanic lithosphere was fixed at ~100 km according to a worldwide plot of age versus thickness for oceanic lithosphere from Turcotte and Schubert (1982).…”
Section: Reconstruction Of Slabmentioning
confidence: 99%