2020
DOI: 10.1002/2050-7038.12500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anoff‐linealgorithm forfuse‐reclosercoordination in distribution networks with photovoltaic resources

Abstract: Summary Distributed energy resources (DERs) have a significant impact on the network's short‐circuit level and fault current direction, but it is almost impossible to precisely predict the presence of DERs in the distribution network. Hence, implementation of new settings for protection system based on a specific scenario for distributed generator, in terms of location and penetration level, is not a suitable solution. Utilization of adaptive protection and changing the overall design of protection system are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implementation of distributed generation (DG) causes a structural change in the distribution network, which no longer acts as a radial network, compromising the adequate coordination between protection devices [3,[5][6][7]. The impact level that DG can cause in the distribution network will depend on, among others, the generator size, type, and location in the network [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The implementation of distributed generation (DG) causes a structural change in the distribution network, which no longer acts as a radial network, compromising the adequate coordination between protection devices [3,[5][6][7]. The impact level that DG can cause in the distribution network will depend on, among others, the generator size, type, and location in the network [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most frequently used protection devices is the fuse. To this device, the implementation of DG can cause a lack of coordination and untimely tripping [10], as the steady-state currents are subject to alterations which can even involve currents going through the fuse in reverse direction [7]. This means currents going through the fuse can be generated from locations both downstream and upstream of the fuse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another classification of protection coordination methods of active distribution systems is presented in Table 1. According to Table 1, both DG‐based and the protection system (PS)‐based strategies can be implemented in an offline 15,22‐24 or online 8,25‐30 manner. In the offline methods, the coordination of protection devices is ensured in sizing and siting of DGs in the planning stage 6,31‐33 or output of DGs in operation stage 8,34‐36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low cost adaptation of existing protection systems in instances when DG is added to the network, ensuring a steady network operation, is an objective that should be achieved by any DSO 4 . Thus, to characterize cases such as lack of coordination, a reliability study was carried out on a test network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%