2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-018-1586-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An SHPB Test Study on Stress Wave Energy Attenuation in Jointed Rock Masses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the thickness and moisture content of the filling sand have great influence on the dynamic mechanical properties of the joint. Li et al (2019) used SHPB test system to conduct uniaxial impact tests on granite samples containing artificial joints, and studied the influence of joint matching coefficient (JMC) on the quality factors of rock samples. In addition, considering factors such as joint distribution Angle, joint contact, joint number, joint spacing and length-diameter ratio of specimens, some researchers (e.g., Wu et al, 2013Wu et al, , 2014Wu and Zhao, 2015;Liu and Su, 2016;Amalokwu et al, 2016) conducted dynamic impact compression tests on different types of rock joints and obtained the dynamic mechanical properties of the samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the thickness and moisture content of the filling sand have great influence on the dynamic mechanical properties of the joint. Li et al (2019) used SHPB test system to conduct uniaxial impact tests on granite samples containing artificial joints, and studied the influence of joint matching coefficient (JMC) on the quality factors of rock samples. In addition, considering factors such as joint distribution Angle, joint contact, joint number, joint spacing and length-diameter ratio of specimens, some researchers (e.g., Wu et al, 2013Wu et al, , 2014Wu and Zhao, 2015;Liu and Su, 2016;Amalokwu et al, 2016) conducted dynamic impact compression tests on different types of rock joints and obtained the dynamic mechanical properties of the samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, rock materials are often subjected to dynamic loads, such as impact, blasting, and vibration, and the Split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) has become a common device used for studying the dynamic failure of rocks under high loading rates or strain rate. [3,[6][7][8][9] e study of dynamic tensile properties of rock materials by using the Brazilian disc test has attracted many researchers' attention. Gong and Zhao [6] put forward a DIF (dynamic increase factor) model to describe the dynamic tensile properties of sandstone in the range of low loading rate to the high loading rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic effect on energy dissipation is fundamentally reflected by the combined action of stress and strain of the coal specimen. During the entire process of dynamic loading and unloading, the energy carried by incident, reflected, and transmitted waves is expressed as :{Ei=AbCbEbσi2dt=AbEbCbεi2dtEr=AbCbEbσr2dt=AbEbCbεr2dtEt=AbCbEbσt2dt=AbEbCbεt2dtwhere E i , E r , and E t are the incident energy, reflected energy, and transmitted energy, respectively, kJ; σ i , σ r , and σ t are the stresses corresponding to the incident, reflected, and transmitted waves in the pressure bar, respectively, MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic effect on energy dissipation is fundamentally reflected by the combined action of stress and strain of the coal specimen. During the entire process of dynamic loading and unloading, the energy carried by incident, reflected, and transmitted waves is expressed as 57,63 :…”
Section: Effect Of Strain Rate On Energy Dissipation Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%