2021
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2110817118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ultra-low-cost electroporator with microneedle electrodes (ePatch) for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

Abstract: Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other pathogens with pandemic potential requires safe, protective, inexpensive, and easily accessible vaccines that can be developed and manufactured rapidly at a large scale. DNA vaccines can achieve these criteria, but induction of strong immune responses has often required bulky, expensive electroporation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By leveraging similar principles to ElectroPen and combining it with another attractive vaccine delivery technology called microneedles, we developed a new platform called ePatch: an ultralow-cost, portable microneedle electroporator to deliver DNA vaccines. 18 Through benchmarking against state-of-the-art electroporation technologies, we have shown comparable efficacy and better safety delivering GFP-encoding plasmids. In a mice vaccination study with SARS-CoV-2, we have shown robust immune responses with at least 10-fold dose sparing, relative to intradermal and intramuscular injection alone, as well as protection against a SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus elevated from 20% to 90%.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…By leveraging similar principles to ElectroPen and combining it with another attractive vaccine delivery technology called microneedles, we developed a new platform called ePatch: an ultralow-cost, portable microneedle electroporator to deliver DNA vaccines. 18 Through benchmarking against state-of-the-art electroporation technologies, we have shown comparable efficacy and better safety delivering GFP-encoding plasmids. In a mice vaccination study with SARS-CoV-2, we have shown robust immune responses with at least 10-fold dose sparing, relative to intradermal and intramuscular injection alone, as well as protection against a SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus elevated from 20% to 90%.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A DNA vaccine is relatively inexpensive. Xia et al have demonstrated that the handheld electroporation device with a microneedle electrode array can easily overcome the relative expensiveness of the conventional electroporation that is usually needed for inducing a strong immune response [ 16 ]. The development of DNA vaccines is time-saving as it is undemanding to produce large amounts of the target antigen compared with making proteins, growing viruses and bacteria, or synthesizing mRNA [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the recent pandemic experience, the speed of vaccine development is crucial especially when the infectious agent is characterized by a high mutation rate and high transmissibility. Thus, the most important requirements for the anti-COVID-19 vaccines that are safeness, protectiveness, accessibility, and inexpensiveness can be achieved via DNA vaccines [ 16 ]. Studies have already demonstrated the positive outcome of the DNA vaccine of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microneedles are undoubtedly the most developed devices to date in transdermal immunization [52]. Although recently a very low-cost microneedle-anchored electroporator device for immunization against SARS-CoV-2 was shown, there are still challenges to overcome [53]. Current studies aim to overcome the remaining challenges in this area [54].…”
Section: Transdermal Administration Based On Microneedlesmentioning
confidence: 99%