2010 53rd IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/mwscas.2010.5548887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ultra-low power ring oscillator for passive UHF RFID transponders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A good baseline for comparing the power dissipation of various oscillators is to calculate the power figures for ultra-low power ring oscillators, which are used in, for example RFID transponders [59] [35]. The voltage-controlled oscillator described in [35] consumes 24 nW at 5.24 MHz, that is E diss = 4.7 × 10 −15 J per oscillation cycle. With vanadium oxide relaxation oscillator one can go to an order of magnitude better: [60] projects 0.5µ W at 1.6 GHz, giving E diss ≈ 10 −16 J per cycle/ Spin torque oscillators are current-driven devices and typically run at sub-millamperes current and at GHz frequency -their voltage (and the dissipated power) depends on how low the resistance of the stack can be mode.…”
Section: Power Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good baseline for comparing the power dissipation of various oscillators is to calculate the power figures for ultra-low power ring oscillators, which are used in, for example RFID transponders [59] [35]. The voltage-controlled oscillator described in [35] consumes 24 nW at 5.24 MHz, that is E diss = 4.7 × 10 −15 J per oscillation cycle. With vanadium oxide relaxation oscillator one can go to an order of magnitude better: [60] projects 0.5µ W at 1.6 GHz, giving E diss ≈ 10 −16 J per cycle/ Spin torque oscillators are current-driven devices and typically run at sub-millamperes current and at GHz frequency -their voltage (and the dissipated power) depends on how low the resistance of the stack can be mode.…”
Section: Power Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between an FS-Backscatter tag and an RFID tag is that FS-Backscatter requires a higher speed local clock for shifting the incident carrier signal. To achieve this, we leverage ring oscillators designs [14,40,43] and tune the circuit to enable 20MHz oscillating frequency while only consuming ∼20µW of power.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-sustaining oscillators abound in nature and in engineered systems -examples include mechanical clocks [1], electronic ring [2][3][4] and LC oscillators [5], spin-torque oscillators [6][7][8][9][10], lasers [11][12][13], MEMS/NEMS-based oscillators [14,15], the heart's neuronal pacemakers [16], engineered molecular oscillators such as the repressilator [17], etc.. The defining characteristic of a self-sustaining oscillator is that it generates sustained "motion" without requiring any stimulus of a similar nature -i.e., it produces an output that changes with time indefinitely, usually in a periodic or quasi-periodic [18] fashion, in the absence of any input that changes with time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we use CMOS ring and high-Q LC oscillators for illustration, but other nanoscale SSNOs such as spin-torque oscillators, NEMS-based oscillators, synthetic biological oscillators, etc., can also serve as substrates for SSNO-based phase logic 4. Ternary and multi-state logic values can also be encoded in phase; indeed, SSNOs can serve as multi-state latches[45].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%