An ultrasound prediction model for probability of vaginal delivery in induction of labor

Garg, Poonam; Gómez‐Roig, M.; Singla, Aprajita

doi:10.2399/prn.19.0273007

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, funnel length and width were not significant in univariate analysis. Then the “Garg score” was reported, 24 and included fetal head–symphysis pubis distance, CL, funneling, and PCA. The prediction of the Garg score was also better than that of BS, but these ultrasonographic parameters were not considered in the univariate analysis in this study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transvaginal ultrasound parameters to evaluate cervical favorability and predict the outcome of induction of labor

Liu

Chen

Liu

et al. 2023

Intl J Gynecology & Obste

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo compare the values of transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) and Bishop score (BS) for predicting outcomes of induction of labor (IOL).MethodsThe BS and TVU were assessed before IOL. TVU parameters included cervical length (CL) and E‐Cervix comprising the cervical hard ratio (HR) and the mean strain level of internal os (IOS). Study end‐points included the duration of the latent phase within 15 or 18 h and delivery within 24 h.ResultsIn multivariable logistic regression models, at the first two end‐points, the areas under the curve (AUCs) for CL with HR were 0.733 and 0.777, and the AUCs for CL with IOS were 0.754 and 0.787, respectively, The AUC for HR was 0.750 at the third end‐point. With receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the best cut‐off value for CL was ≤1.38 cm and that for IOS was ≥0.35. The AUCs of the TVU scoring system by the cut‐off values for CL and IOS for the three end‐points were 0.784, 0.833, and 0.855, respectively. The predicting values of both methods were better than those of the BS (AUC = 0.672, 0.694, and 0.687, respectively).ConclusionCervical length along with E‐Cervix showed better predictive values for successful induction compared with the BS.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%