2017
DOI: 10.1111/trf.14199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unbalanced study that lacks power: a caution about IPTAS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further corroborate our conclusions, we have carried out the adjusted analysis on AML patients suggested by Benjamin and colleagues. 2 As reported in Table 1, the number of PLT units transfused was higher in the INTERCEPT arm, both in the whole group and in the AML subgroup before and after adjustment for the duration of leukopenia. The odds ratio (OR) and the difference (D) were highly significant independently of the analysis.…”
Section: In Replymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…To further corroborate our conclusions, we have carried out the adjusted analysis on AML patients suggested by Benjamin and colleagues. 2 As reported in Table 1, the number of PLT units transfused was higher in the INTERCEPT arm, both in the whole group and in the AML subgroup before and after adjustment for the duration of leukopenia. The odds ratio (OR) and the difference (D) were highly significant independently of the analysis.…”
Section: In Replymentioning
confidence: 75%