2021
DOI: 10.31223/x5ks44
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An uncertainty-focused database approach to extract spatiotemporal trends from qualitative and discontinuous lake-status histories

Abstract: Changes in lake status are often interpreted as palaeoclimate indicators due to their dependence on precipitation and evaporation. The Global Lake Status Database (GLSDB) has since long provided a standardised synopsis of qualitative lake status over the last 30,000 14 C years. Potential sources of uncertainty however are not recorded in the GLSDB. Here we present an updated and improved relational-database framework that incorporates uncertainty in both chronology and the interpretation of palaeoenvironmental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 83 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4. Proxy records for the northern Kalahari for the past 190 ka, arranged broadly west to east, and the central Kenyan Rift Lake level records for comparison, where: (a) Etosha lake (site 26) levels, solid is lake 21 to 24 m deep and striped is low (a few meters) (Hipondoka et al 2014), and (b) Etosha lake (site 26) classes, where left to right is 6 (highest) to 1 (lowest) (De Cort et al, 2021), (c) speleothem growth phases combined from Aikab and Aigama (site 28) and Guinas Meer (site 29) cenotes (Brook et al, 1999), (d) Dante Cave (site 30) speleothem δ 18 O (Sletten et al, 2013), (e) dune accumulation ages for the northwestern (NWK) dunefield Kalahari (site 32) (see individual citations in Thomas and Burrough, 2016), (f) speleothem growth phases at Drotsky's Cave (site 36) and Bone Cave (site 37) (Brook et al, 1998), (g) mega-lake Makgadikgadi (sites 39 to 42) , (h) dune accumulation ages for the northeast (NE) (site 38) and eastern (EK) (site 43) dunefields in the northern Kalahari (see individual citations in Thomas and Burrough, 2016), and (i) central Kenyan Rift lakes outside the region of interest for comparison (combined within Trauth et al, 2003). Figure 5.…”
Section: Table and Figure Captionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4. Proxy records for the northern Kalahari for the past 190 ka, arranged broadly west to east, and the central Kenyan Rift Lake level records for comparison, where: (a) Etosha lake (site 26) levels, solid is lake 21 to 24 m deep and striped is low (a few meters) (Hipondoka et al 2014), and (b) Etosha lake (site 26) classes, where left to right is 6 (highest) to 1 (lowest) (De Cort et al, 2021), (c) speleothem growth phases combined from Aikab and Aigama (site 28) and Guinas Meer (site 29) cenotes (Brook et al, 1999), (d) Dante Cave (site 30) speleothem δ 18 O (Sletten et al, 2013), (e) dune accumulation ages for the northwestern (NWK) dunefield Kalahari (site 32) (see individual citations in Thomas and Burrough, 2016), (f) speleothem growth phases at Drotsky's Cave (site 36) and Bone Cave (site 37) (Brook et al, 1998), (g) mega-lake Makgadikgadi (sites 39 to 42) , (h) dune accumulation ages for the northeast (NE) (site 38) and eastern (EK) (site 43) dunefields in the northern Kalahari (see individual citations in Thomas and Burrough, 2016), and (i) central Kenyan Rift lakes outside the region of interest for comparison (combined within Trauth et al, 2003). Figure 5.…”
Section: Table and Figure Captionsmentioning
confidence: 99%