An uncommon percutaneous treatment of aortic pseudoaneurysm

Yalçın, Ahmet Arif; Kahraman, Serkan; Yildirim, Aydın; Erkanlı, Korhan

doi:10.14744/anatoljcardiol.2018.08068

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While the preservation conditions, thus the suitability for radiocarbon dating, of the samples are unclear, the results propose ca. 2750–2500 BC for the earliest levels of the graves [ 50 : p. 93–94, abb.5]. A burnt tree sample from a layer above the graves was dated to ca.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A burnt tree sample from a layer above the graves was dated to ca. 2450–2300 BC [ 50 : p.94, fn.2], though the stratigraphy of the sample is ambiguous. Contemporaneous local and regional material, especially local ceramics of the Halys Basin, strongly suggests the second half of the 3rd millennium BC for the graves.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This figurine was found in grave H (Level III, phase 5), one of the richest tombs of Alaca Höyük belonging to a female. While no radiocarbon dating from grave H is available, samples from the same level (i.e., Level III, phase 5) strongly support dating of the grave to the second half of the 3 rd millennium BC [ 50 ]. Furthermore, direct parallels of black burnished ceramics from this grave were uncovered in the cemetery and settlement areas at Resuloğlu and dated to circa 2500/2400–2100/2050 BC [ 52 – 55 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Why did the use of antimony-bearing alloys in Bronze Age Anatolia fall dormant after the Early Bronze Age?: A Case from Resuloğlu (Çorum, Turkey)

Dardeniz

2020

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The archaeometallurgical and archaeological research carried out in Anatolia has provided numerous examples of diverse alloying practices representing different levels of societal interaction, from the extraction of ores to the trade of finished goods and high level gift exchange among elites. While discussions abound about the exploitation of mines, mining settlements, possible origins of artifacts, resources of copper, arsenic, and especially tin to improve our knowledge about Anatolian Bronze Age mining and metallurgy, uncommon alloying practices including the use of antimony, nickel, or lead have long remained in the shadows of scholarly research. With the aim of bringing attention to the diversity in alloying practices in Anatolian metallurgy, this article focuses on the use of antimony through an appraisal of archaeological and textual evidence from Bronze Age Anatolia. Archaeometric data from several Early Bronze Age sites are re-examined alongside new data emerging from Resuloğlu (Çorum, Turkey) to explain the reduction of the variety of alloy types used. Portable-XRF analysis of artifacts from Resuloğlu and mineralogical analysis of an antimony-bearing ore fragment present evidence of use of antimony at the region during the Early Bronze Age. This period is followed by disappearance of antimony in material record until the Iron Age, while textual records weakly refer to its circulation within the region. This paper considers geological, technological, and socio-economic factors to explain why the use of antimony alloys falls dormant after the Early Bronze Age. The political and economic change towards centralization over geological and technological factors is proposed as an explanation.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Why did the use of antimony-bearing alloys in Bronze Age Anatolia fall dormant after the Early Bronze Age?: A Case from Resuloğlu (Çorum, Turkey)

Dardeniz

2020

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some sites were considered as more prosperous (e.g., Alaca Höyük, Eskiyapar, Mahmatlar, Horoztepe) than others (e.g., Balıbağı, Kalınkaya-Toptaştepe). Prosperity-related arguments were based on the relation between the production and consumption of bronze and centralized, hierarchical complex societies [e.g., 13 , 24 , 25 ]. However, not much has been hypothesized related to a political economy sponsoring this wealth and controlling the material flow.…”

Section: The Archaeological Context: Social Inequality In the 3 ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Metal consumption of a middle-range society in the late 3rd millennium BC Anatolia: A new socioeconomic approach

Dardeniz

Yildirim

2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article discusses the socioeconomic dynamics of metal consumption patterns in the 3rd millennium BC north-central Anatolian site of Resuloğlu (Çorum, Turkey). The socio-political structure of the site confirms a nonstate, socially complex community with a range of hierarchical and heterarchical expressions. This study presents the results of archaeological, compositional (n = 307), and isotopic (n = 45) analyses of the complete metal collection of Resuloğlu uncovered through two decades of systematic excavations with a well-established chronology. The elemental compositions of metal objects obtained with pXRF combined with lead isotope analysis denote a high diversity in alloy types and sources. The compositional analysis highlights the consumption of various binary and ternary alloys for different object types. The lead isotope ratios confirm the use of both in proximity to metallic sources and access to macro-regional trade extending from the Black Sea coast towards the Taurus Mountain range. The site appears as a part of linkages whereby goods and valuables were exchanged within decentralized networks of middle-range societies. The diversity in metal consumption suggests group-driven choices and networks rather than top-down control of social elites. This allows us to confront the conventional approach to the role of metals as the primary motivator for social complexity and inequality in all parts of the 3rd millennium BC Anatolia.

show abstract

An uncommon percutaneous treatment of aortic pseudoaneurysm

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

Why did the use of antimony-bearing alloys in Bronze Age Anatolia fall dormant after the Early Bronze Age?: A Case from Resuloğlu (Çorum, Turkey)

Why did the use of antimony-bearing alloys in Bronze Age Anatolia fall dormant after the Early Bronze Age?: A Case from Resuloğlu (Çorum, Turkey)

Metal consumption of a middle-range society in the late 3rd millennium BC Anatolia: A new socioeconomic approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About