2022
DOI: 10.1017/etds.2022.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An uncountable Furstenberg–Zimmer structure theory

Abstract: Furstenberg–Zimmer structure theory refers to the extension of the dichotomy between the compact and weakly mixing parts of a measure-preserving dynamical system and the algebraic and geometric descriptions of such parts to a conditional setting, where such dichotomy is established relative to a factor and conditional analogs of those algebraic and geometric descriptions are sought. Although the unconditional dichotomy and the characterizations are known for arbitrary systems, the relative situation is underst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Homogeneous extensions are very closely related to the notions of isometric extensions and compact extensions, which play a fundamental role in the Furstenberg-Zimmer structure theory [7,29,30] of measure-preserving systems, as well as subsequent refinements of that theory, such as is found in the work of Host and Kra [12]. See [14] for a discussion of these relationships in both the countable and uncountable settings. It is common in the literature to reduce to the corefree case when k∈K kLk −1 = {1}, by quotienting out by the normal core k∈K kLk −1 , but we will not need to use the corefree property here.…”
Section: And One Can Then Define the Notion Of Two Cncprbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homogeneous extensions are very closely related to the notions of isometric extensions and compact extensions, which play a fundamental role in the Furstenberg-Zimmer structure theory [7,29,30] of measure-preserving systems, as well as subsequent refinements of that theory, such as is found in the work of Host and Kra [12]. See [14] for a discussion of these relationships in both the countable and uncountable settings. It is common in the literature to reduce to the corefree case when k∈K kLk −1 = {1}, by quotienting out by the normal core k∈K kLk −1 , but we will not need to use the corefree property here.…”
Section: And One Can Then Define the Notion Of Two Cncprbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some foundational aspects arising in the ergodic theory of uncountable groups and inseparable spaces was systematically investigated by the fourth author and Tao in [28,30,29] and by the fourth author in [27]. For example, in the area of multiple recurrence, the tool of disintegration of measures is used extensively.…”
Section: Introduction a Famous And Deep Theorem Of Szemerédimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major challenges is then to find a suitable alternative framework in which we find viable replacements for tools such as disintegration of measures which can help to meaningfully adapt the arguments from the countable setting. For further details, we refer the interested reader to [28,30,29,27].…”
Section: Introduction a Famous And Deep Theorem Of Szemerédimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal is to capture a wider range of structures and phenomena in probability theory and related fields such as statistics and information theory. On one hand, there is interest in moving measure theory beyond the need of countability, for example in the work of Jamneshan and Tao [15], and in their work with others in expanding ergodic theory in that direction [12][13][14]16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the definition of quotient σ-algebra, it suffices to show that q −1 (q(A)) is a measurable subset of X. But now by (12), q −1 (q(A)) = A, which is measurable. So q(A) is a measurable set, and hence h is a measurable kernel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%