2017
DOI: 10.21692/haps.2017.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Undergraduate Anatomy Lab Revision Success Story

Abstract: The Anatomy and Physiology lab at Western Kentucky University was revised to increase formative assessment through the use of e-texts and e-material, introduce hands-on learning via the Anatomy in Clay® System, and provide context for content in the form of case studies and course sequencing. Success of the revision was measured through analysis of grade distributions before and after the revision, coupled with self-administered surveys to measure student perceptions of the course. The percentage of students e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Professional anatomical models are often expensive, requiring the teacher to look for cheaper alternatives, such as using clay or assembling models on paper (Rehorek et al, 2019). Although there are several alternatives to teaching anatomy, most authors agree that the use of the corpse is still ideal, allowing the student to have a three-dimensional relationship of structures, texture, and flexibility in handling (McDaniel & Daday, 2017;Rehorek et al, 2019).…”
Section: Anatomical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Professional anatomical models are often expensive, requiring the teacher to look for cheaper alternatives, such as using clay or assembling models on paper (Rehorek et al, 2019). Although there are several alternatives to teaching anatomy, most authors agree that the use of the corpse is still ideal, allowing the student to have a three-dimensional relationship of structures, texture, and flexibility in handling (McDaniel & Daday, 2017;Rehorek et al, 2019).…”
Section: Anatomical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%