Undergraduate research in the biochemistry, cell, and molecular biology program at Drake University uses apprenticeship, cooperative-style learning, and peer mentoring in a cross-disciplinary and crosscommunity educational program. We call it the one-room schoolhouse approach to teaching undergraduate research. This approach is cost effective, aids learning, supports the development of science and transferable management skills, is productive, and supports diversity. It allows a small set of faculty to involve large numbers of students in research and maintain a productive scholarship program. It provides students with skills in scientific research and transferable skills that they apply to a wide set of careers.Keywords: Undergraduate research, peer-mentoring, biochemistry education.We need more time and resources! It is the common rallying cry of faculty. Administration wants us to produce learning in a cost-effective manner. But how can teaching undergraduate research be cost effective, especially at predominantly undergraduate institutions that lack graduate students? One faculty member working alongside each of two to three students for 4 hours/week to each earn one credit hour is not cost effective. Further, we all want products that demonstrate learning. But teaching undergraduate research can slow down research production. A cycle in which a few novice researchers are trained every semester to work on the project for a limited time can stall the project at the training phase and thus not develop a substantial cohort of students with expertise or become optimally productive. This is one of the problems in incorporating research projects into regular laboratory classes. Like professionals trying to balance family and career, wanting to do it all, we have been trying to balance individual student learning with administrative demands and do it all.When we established the interdisciplinary biochemistry, cell, and molecular biology program at Drake University, we quickly realized that we needed academic structures that could accommodate large numbers of students with few faculties. Accordingly, we developed the curricular models and working communities that cultivated continuity and stability, through efficient use of resources. Our research, in particular, was a pressing need. Previously, we had successfully developed a model to involve large numbers of students in research with outside funding and technical support [1,2]. Although our program requires students to participate in research, they have a number of alternatives that include this class, research in other laboratories, or internships. But the majority of the students choose this research program.Our research class appealed to a range of student audiences, each with different skills and needs. In addition to the major research class (advanced molecular life sciences laboratory), we also had novice students who wanted to begin research but were not quite equipped to deal with the prerequisite knowledge level for the project. These students, typically ...