2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.03.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An understanding of human dynamics in urban subway traffic from the Maximum Entropy Principle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics result in spread processes with a more substantial decay time (diminishing more quickly) than would be predicted by Poisson processes. Researchers continue examining different mechanisms of human activities in two general emphases: (1) how individuals take actions and respond with various queueing strategies, for instance, priority queueing (Barabási, 2005), time-varying priority queueing (Jo, Pan, & Kaski, 2012), and stochastic queueing (Walraevens, Demoor, Maertens, & Bruneel, 2012); and (2) the overall patterns of inter-event distributions without considering individual strategies, such as fractals (Fan, Guo, & Zha, 2012), maximum entropy (Yong, Ni, Shen, & Ji, 2016), and multiple timescales (Zhang, Cui, Song, Zhu, & Yang, 2016). Barabási's (2005) landmark human dynamics research would not have been possible without the massive number of email messages from several thousands of email users, along with the details of senders, recipients, time, and size of each email.…”
Section: I G Ital Informati On Technolog Ie S Tr An S Form H Umanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics result in spread processes with a more substantial decay time (diminishing more quickly) than would be predicted by Poisson processes. Researchers continue examining different mechanisms of human activities in two general emphases: (1) how individuals take actions and respond with various queueing strategies, for instance, priority queueing (Barabási, 2005), time-varying priority queueing (Jo, Pan, & Kaski, 2012), and stochastic queueing (Walraevens, Demoor, Maertens, & Bruneel, 2012); and (2) the overall patterns of inter-event distributions without considering individual strategies, such as fractals (Fan, Guo, & Zha, 2012), maximum entropy (Yong, Ni, Shen, & Ji, 2016), and multiple timescales (Zhang, Cui, Song, Zhu, & Yang, 2016). Barabási's (2005) landmark human dynamics research would not have been possible without the massive number of email messages from several thousands of email users, along with the details of senders, recipients, time, and size of each email.…”
Section: I G Ital Informati On Technolog Ie S Tr An S Form H Umanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3]). Under this general understanding, it is not surprising that, after Jaynes, MaxEnt has been presented as a general method for inference [4][5][6][7] and being applied in a large range of subjects such as, but not limited to, economics [8,9], ecology [10,11], cell biology [12,13], opinion dynamics [14,15] and geography [16,17]. This modern perspective of MaxEnt is seen as a method for updating probability distributions when new information about the system becomes available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of selecting probability distributions by maximizing a functional-namely entropy-usually under a set of expected values constraints, arriving at what is known as Gibbs distributions. Since Shore and Johnson [6] MaxEnt has been understood as a general method for inference-see also [7][8][9]-hence it is not surprising that (i) Gibbs distributions are what is known in statistical theory as exponential family-the only distributions for which sufficient statistics exist (see e.g., [10]), (ii) MaxEnt encompasses the methods of Bayesian statistics [11], and (iii) MaxEnt has found successful applications in several fields of science (e.g., [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%