2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Unexpected Subdural Collection: Story of a Prostatic Metastasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnostic ambiguity between dural metastasis and SDH (regardless of chronicity) is a common thread among several cases from the literature, including our own. 4 5 6 7 10 All of the cases of dural metastases that we identified presented with either a hyperdense, mixed density, or isodense lesion ( Table 1 ). In contrast, the majority of true SDHs that were associated with prostate metastases presented as a hypodense lesion ( Table 2 ), a difference that is statistically significant between these two small cohorts ( p = 0.004, Fisher's exact test).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The diagnostic ambiguity between dural metastasis and SDH (regardless of chronicity) is a common thread among several cases from the literature, including our own. 4 5 6 7 10 All of the cases of dural metastases that we identified presented with either a hyperdense, mixed density, or isodense lesion ( Table 1 ). In contrast, the majority of true SDHs that were associated with prostate metastases presented as a hypodense lesion ( Table 2 ), a difference that is statistically significant between these two small cohorts ( p = 0.004, Fisher's exact test).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We identified eight such cases in addition to our own ( Table 1 ). 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 The age at presentation of these cases ranged from 45 to 76 years (mean 63.9 years). The most frequent presenting symptom was headache (56%), followed by altered mental status/confusion (44%), motor deficits (44%), and gait ataxia (33%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%