Aim of the study: This research paper aims to investigate the functioning of Sentence Review Boards (SRBs) in India, focusing on the identification and analysis of key issues and challenges associated with their operation. Design/Methodology: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to gather relevant information and insights regarding SRBs in India. The study utilized a qualitative research approach, incorporating an analysis of primary and secondary data, including legal documents, reports, and case studies. Findings: The findings highlight several significant issues and challenges that affect the working of SRBs in India. These include procedural complexities, inadequate resources and infrastructure, inconsistent decision-making, limited transparency, and the need for enhanced training and expertise among board members. Practical Implications: The research contributes to a deeper understanding of the functioning of SRBs in India and provides insights for policymakers, legal professionals, and stakeholders involved in criminal justice and sentencing reforms. The identified issues and challenges can inform the development of strategies and reforms to improve the effectiveness and fairness of SRBs in the country. Originality/value: This research paper presents a comprehensive examination of the issues and challenges faced by SRBs in India, offering insights into an area that has received limited attention in existing literature. The findings and recommendations have practical implications for enhancing the functioning of SRBs and ensuring justice and fairness in the review of sentences. The authors affirm that this is an original work. Keywords: Sentence Review Boards, criminal justice, India, issues, challenges Paper Type: Review Paper