2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unusual blood sequestering tapeworm (Sanguilevator yearsleyi n. gen., n. sp.) from Borneo with description of Cathetocephalus resendezi n. sp. from Mexico and molecular support for the recognition of the order Cathetocephalidea (Platyhelminthes: Eucestoda)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also included in these analyses were 2 previously sequenced species of Acanthobothrium for which hologenophores and 28S rDNA data were available from GenBank: Acanthobothrium parviuncinatum Young, 1954 With respect to the selection of outgroups, the position of the genus Acanthobothrium within the larger framework of tetraphyllidean cestodes is unclear. The molecular work of Olson et al (2001), Caira et al (2005), and Healy et al (2009) suggests that the genus is most closely related to the Proteocephalidea, a relatively speciose order of tapeworms parasitic primarily in freshwater teleosts, but also in some amphibians and reptiles. Thus, the outgroup consisted of 3 species representing some of the more basal lineages of proteocephalideans, as determined by Zehnder and Mariaux (1999) and de Chambrier et al (2004), for which comparable data were available from GenBank.…”
Section: Molecular Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also included in these analyses were 2 previously sequenced species of Acanthobothrium for which hologenophores and 28S rDNA data were available from GenBank: Acanthobothrium parviuncinatum Young, 1954 With respect to the selection of outgroups, the position of the genus Acanthobothrium within the larger framework of tetraphyllidean cestodes is unclear. The molecular work of Olson et al (2001), Caira et al (2005), and Healy et al (2009) suggests that the genus is most closely related to the Proteocephalidea, a relatively speciose order of tapeworms parasitic primarily in freshwater teleosts, but also in some amphibians and reptiles. Thus, the outgroup consisted of 3 species representing some of the more basal lineages of proteocephalideans, as determined by Zehnder and Mariaux (1999) and de Chambrier et al (2004), for which comparable data were available from GenBank.…”
Section: Molecular Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A portion of the nuclear large subunit 28S rDNA (D1-D3; ~1,300 nucleotides) gene was selected based on its previous established utility in resolving interspecific phylogenetic relationships in other cestode groups (e.g., Zehnder and Mariaux 1999, Olson et al 2001, de Chambrier et al 2004, Caira et al 2005, Waeschenbach et al 2007. DNA was extracted from the midsection of worms preserved in 95% ethanol and the terminal proglottid(s) and scolex of each was prepared as a whole mount to serve as a voucher for the specimens from which sequence data were generated.…”
Section: Molecular Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, they justified their inclusion by the scolex morphology, the presence of gladiate spinitriches on the cephalic peduncle and the host. The monophyly of the Proteocephalidea has been confirmed Mariaux 1999, de Chambrier et al 2004a), whereas the Onchobothriidae was found to be paraphyletic , Caira et al 2005, Waeschenbach et al 2007. In this line of reasoning, the molecular-based phylogenetic analysis should encompass all the genera of this family, and the possible inclusion of each genus in the proposed new order should be made after the molecular study rather than before.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…, Waeschenbach et al 2007) and thus was split into three orders: Litobothriidea Dailey, 1969, Cathetocephalidea Schmidt et Beverigde, 1990and Rhinebothriidea Healy, Caira, Jensen, Webster et Littlewood, 2009(Dailey 1969, Schmidt and Beveridge 1990, Olson and Caira 2001, Caira et al 2005, Healy et al 2009). Each of these orders was erected on the basis of both molecular and morphological data, and showed at least a single unifying synapomorphy for the whole group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Caira et al (1999) questioned whether the Cathetocephalidae and the Disculicipitidae represented two different families. More recent molecular data (Caira et al 2005) corroborated the recognition of the order Cathetocephalidea erected by Schmidt and Beveridge (1990). According to the molecular analysis of Olson et al (2001) the Tetraphyllidea are separated in four groups: the Rhinebothri-*Corresponding author: jordimiquel@ub.edu Abbreviations to all figures: AC -apical cone, AM -arched membranes, ASE -anterior spermatozoon extremity, Ax -axoneme, Ax1 -first axoneme, Ax2 -second axoneme, C -centrioles, C1 -first centriole, C2 -second centriole, CB -crested body, CM -cortical microtubules, D -doublets, F -flagellum, F1 -first flagellum, F2 -second flagellum, G -granules of glycogen, IB -intercentriolar body, MCP -median cytoplasmic process, N -nucleus, PM -plasma membrane, PSE -posterior spermatozoon extremity, S -singlets, SR -striated rootlets inae, the Phyllobothriidae, the Onchobothriidae and the genus Acanthobothrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%