1937
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(37)90281-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unusual case of auricular parasystole showing “exit” block

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1948
1948
1963
1963

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus in figures 1 to 5, the cycles, both those actually measured and those calculated, do not vary by more than 0.05 second, which is within the limits of errors of measurement. If criteria used for the differential diagnosis of paroxysmal tachycardias35 were applied, much greater variations could be allowed in the case of a ventricular focus, but this would render the diagnosis of parasystole very difficult.3 As a matter of fact, parasystole has been recognized in the face of an apparent irregularity of its pacemaker by assuming either a temporary "break through" of the impulses of the extraneous dominant pacemaker past the barrier of protection of the ectopic focus (intermittent parasystole) 2, 14, 21, 23, 46 or a temporary release of an "exit block"9 15,16,30 which had kept many of its impulses confined exclusively to the immediate region of the parasystolic pacemaker. Furthermore, variations in the manifest cycle of the parasystolic beats can be expected with varying degrees of delayed con-duction of impulses from the ectopic center to the surrounding myocardium such as occurs in second degree A-V block.4 ' 7, 12, 14, 15, 29 This latter factor will become manifest in the form of varying A-V conduction times, when the parasystolic focus is located in the A-V node, as in figure 4.…”
Section: The Regularity Of the Parasystolic Pacemakermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus in figures 1 to 5, the cycles, both those actually measured and those calculated, do not vary by more than 0.05 second, which is within the limits of errors of measurement. If criteria used for the differential diagnosis of paroxysmal tachycardias35 were applied, much greater variations could be allowed in the case of a ventricular focus, but this would render the diagnosis of parasystole very difficult.3 As a matter of fact, parasystole has been recognized in the face of an apparent irregularity of its pacemaker by assuming either a temporary "break through" of the impulses of the extraneous dominant pacemaker past the barrier of protection of the ectopic focus (intermittent parasystole) 2, 14, 21, 23, 46 or a temporary release of an "exit block"9 15,16,30 which had kept many of its impulses confined exclusively to the immediate region of the parasystolic pacemaker. Furthermore, variations in the manifest cycle of the parasystolic beats can be expected with varying degrees of delayed con-duction of impulses from the ectopic center to the surrounding myocardium such as occurs in second degree A-V block.4 ' 7, 12, 14, 15, 29 This latter factor will become manifest in the form of varying A-V conduction times, when the parasystolic focus is located in the A-V node, as in figure 4.…”
Section: The Regularity Of the Parasystolic Pacemakermentioning
confidence: 99%